File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0014
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85064993010
- PMID: 30942266
- WOS: WOS:000496732700007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Motor skills assessments: Support for a general motor factor for the movement assessment battery for children-2 and the bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency-2
Title | Motor skills assessments: Support for a general motor factor for the movement assessment battery for children-2 and the bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency-2 |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency Motor skills Evaluation report Movement Assessment Battery for Children Second Edition Psychometrics |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Citation | Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 51-59 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2019, Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul. All rights reserved. Objective: To evaluate the construct validity and model-based reliability of general and specific contributions of the subscales of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2) when evaluating motor skills across a range of psychiatric disorders. Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor analysis were conducted on BOT-2 data from 187 elementary school students (grades 1 to 6) (mean age: 113 ± 20 months; boys: N = 117, 62.56%) and on MABC-2 data from 127 elementary school students (grade 1) (mean age: 76 ± 2 months; boys: N = 58, 45.67%). Results: The results of the CFA fit the data for multidimensionality for the BOT-2 and presented poor fit indices for the MABC-2. For both tests, the bifactor model showed that the reliability of the subscales was poor. Conclusions: The BOT-2 exhibited factorial validity with a multidimensional structure among the current samples, but the MABC-2 showed poor fit indices, insufficient to confirm its multidimensional structure. For both tests, most of the reliable variance came from a general motor factor (M-factor), therefore the scoring and reporting of subscale scores were not justified for both tests. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/288942 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.716 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Okuda, Paola Matiko Martins | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pangelinan, Melissa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Capellini, Simone A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cogo-Moreira, Hugo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-12T08:06:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-12T08:06:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 51-59 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2237-6089 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/288942 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2019, Sociedade de Psiquiatria do Rio Grande do Sul. All rights reserved. Objective: To evaluate the construct validity and model-based reliability of general and specific contributions of the subscales of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2) when evaluating motor skills across a range of psychiatric disorders. Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bifactor analysis were conducted on BOT-2 data from 187 elementary school students (grades 1 to 6) (mean age: 113 ± 20 months; boys: N = 117, 62.56%) and on MABC-2 data from 127 elementary school students (grade 1) (mean age: 76 ± 2 months; boys: N = 58, 45.67%). Results: The results of the CFA fit the data for multidimensionality for the BOT-2 and presented poor fit indices for the MABC-2. For both tests, the bifactor model showed that the reliability of the subscales was poor. Conclusions: The BOT-2 exhibited factorial validity with a multidimensional structure among the current samples, but the MABC-2 showed poor fit indices, insufficient to confirm its multidimensional structure. For both tests, most of the reliable variance came from a general motor factor (M-factor), therefore the scoring and reporting of subscale scores were not justified for both tests. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency | - |
dc.subject | Motor skills | - |
dc.subject | Evaluation report | - |
dc.subject | Movement Assessment Battery for Children | - |
dc.subject | Second Edition | - |
dc.subject | Psychometrics | - |
dc.title | Motor skills assessments: Support for a general motor factor for the movement assessment battery for children-2 and the bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency-2 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0014 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30942266 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85064993010 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 41 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 51 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 59 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000496732700007 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2237-6089 | - |