File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Setting priorities for mental health research in Brazil

TitleSetting priorities for mental health research in Brazil
Agenda de prioridades de pesquisa para saúde mental no Brasil
Authors
KeywordsMental health services
Health research agenda
Health priorities
Health care rationing
Health priorities agenda
Issue Date2012
Citation
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 2012, v. 34, n. 4, p. 434-439 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The main aim of this study is to review the agenda for research priorities of mental health in Brazil. Methodology: The first step was to gather 28 experts (22 researchers, five policy makers, and the coordinator) representing all mental health fields from different geographical areas of the country. Participants were asked to list what they considered to be the most relevant mental health research questions for the country to address in the next 10 years. Seventeen participants answered this question; after redundancies were excluded, a total of 110 responses were collected. As the second step, participants were asked to rank which questions were the 35 most significant. The final step was to score 15 items for each of the 35 selected questions to determine whether it would be a) answerable, b) effective, c) deliverable, d) equitable, and e) effective at reducing the burden of mental health. The ten highest ranked questions were then selected. Results: There were four questions addressing primary care with respect to a) the effectiveness of interventions, b) "matrix support", c) comparisons of different models of stepped care, and d) interventions to enhance identification and treatment of common mental disorders at the Family Health Program. The other questions were related to the evaluation of mental health services for adults and children/adolescents to clarify barriers to treatment in primary care, drug addiction, and severe mental disorders; to investigate the cost-benefit relationship of anti-psychotics; to design interventions to decrease alcohol consumption; and to apply new technologies (telemedicine) for education and supervision of non-specialists. Conclusion: This priority-setting research exercise highlighted a need for implementing investments at the primary-care level, particularly in the family health program; the urgent need to evaluate services; and policies to improve equity by increasing accessibility to services and testing interventions to reduce barriers for seeking mental health treatment. © 2012 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/289023
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.051
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGregório, Guilherme-
dc.contributor.authorTomlinson, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorGerolin, Jerônimo-
dc.contributor.authorKieling, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Hugo Cogo-
dc.contributor.authorRazzouk, Denise-
dc.contributor.authorMari, Jair de Jesus-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T08:06:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-12T08:06:29Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 2012, v. 34, n. 4, p. 434-439-
dc.identifier.issn1516-4446-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/289023-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The main aim of this study is to review the agenda for research priorities of mental health in Brazil. Methodology: The first step was to gather 28 experts (22 researchers, five policy makers, and the coordinator) representing all mental health fields from different geographical areas of the country. Participants were asked to list what they considered to be the most relevant mental health research questions for the country to address in the next 10 years. Seventeen participants answered this question; after redundancies were excluded, a total of 110 responses were collected. As the second step, participants were asked to rank which questions were the 35 most significant. The final step was to score 15 items for each of the 35 selected questions to determine whether it would be a) answerable, b) effective, c) deliverable, d) equitable, and e) effective at reducing the burden of mental health. The ten highest ranked questions were then selected. Results: There were four questions addressing primary care with respect to a) the effectiveness of interventions, b) "matrix support", c) comparisons of different models of stepped care, and d) interventions to enhance identification and treatment of common mental disorders at the Family Health Program. The other questions were related to the evaluation of mental health services for adults and children/adolescents to clarify barriers to treatment in primary care, drug addiction, and severe mental disorders; to investigate the cost-benefit relationship of anti-psychotics; to design interventions to decrease alcohol consumption; and to apply new technologies (telemedicine) for education and supervision of non-specialists. Conclusion: This priority-setting research exercise highlighted a need for implementing investments at the primary-care level, particularly in the family health program; the urgent need to evaluate services; and policies to improve equity by increasing accessibility to services and testing interventions to reduce barriers for seeking mental health treatment. © 2012 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Psiquiatria-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectMental health services-
dc.subjectHealth research agenda-
dc.subjectHealth priorities-
dc.subjectHealth care rationing-
dc.subjectHealth priorities agenda-
dc.titleSetting priorities for mental health research in Brazil-
dc.titleAgenda de prioridades de pesquisa para saúde mental no Brasil-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rbp.2012.05.006-
dc.identifier.pmid23429814-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84874536790-
dc.identifier.volume34-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage434-
dc.identifier.epage439-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000313949500010-
dc.identifier.issnl1516-4446-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats