File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85069789362
- PMID: 31337373
- WOS: WOS:000477043000001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis
Title | A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Cognitive bias modification Interpretation bias Qualitative research Psychosis Paranoia |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpsychiatr/ |
Citation | BMC Psychiatry, 2019, v. 19, p. article no. 255 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background:
Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) has been used successfully as a computer-based intervention in disorders such as anxiety. However, CBM to modify interpretations of ambiguous information relevant to paranoia has not yet been tested. We conducted a qualitative investigation of a novel intervention called CBM for paranoia (CBM-pa) to examine its acceptability in patients with psychosis.
Methods:
Eight participants with psychosis who completed CBM-pa were identified by purposive sampling and invited for a semi-structured interview to explore the facilitators and barriers to participation, optimum form of delivery, perceived usefulness of CBM-pa and their opinions on applying CBM-pa as a computerised intervention. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis by researchers working in collaboration with service users.
Results:
Themes emerged relating to participants’ perception about delivery, engagement, programme understanding, factors influencing experience, perceived impact and application of CBM-pa. CBM-pa was regarded as easy, straightforward and enjoyable. It was well-accepted among those we interviewed, who understood the procedure as a psychological intervention. Patients reported that it increased their capacity for adopting alternative interpretations of emotionally ambiguous scenarios. Although participants all agreed on the test-like nature of the current CBM-pa format, they considered that taking part in sessions had improved their overall wellbeing. Most of them valued the computer-based interface of CBM-pa but favoured the idea of combining CBM-pa with some form of human interaction.
Conclusions:
CBM-pa is an acceptable intervention that was well-received by our sample of patients with paranoia. The current findings reflect positively on the acceptability and experience of CBM-pa in the target population. Patient opinion supports further development and testing of CBM-pa as a possible adjunct treatment for paranoia.
Trial registration:
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN: 90749868. Retrospectively registered on 12 May 2016. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/289612 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.301 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | LEUNG, CJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fosuaah, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Frerichs, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Heslin, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kabir, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, TMC | - |
dc.contributor.author | McGuire, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Meek, C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mouchlianitis, E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nath, AS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Peters, E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shergill, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Stahl, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Trotta, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yiend, J | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-22T08:15:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-22T08:15:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Psychiatry, 2019, v. 19, p. article no. 255 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-244X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/289612 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) has been used successfully as a computer-based intervention in disorders such as anxiety. However, CBM to modify interpretations of ambiguous information relevant to paranoia has not yet been tested. We conducted a qualitative investigation of a novel intervention called CBM for paranoia (CBM-pa) to examine its acceptability in patients with psychosis. Methods: Eight participants with psychosis who completed CBM-pa were identified by purposive sampling and invited for a semi-structured interview to explore the facilitators and barriers to participation, optimum form of delivery, perceived usefulness of CBM-pa and their opinions on applying CBM-pa as a computerised intervention. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis by researchers working in collaboration with service users. Results: Themes emerged relating to participants’ perception about delivery, engagement, programme understanding, factors influencing experience, perceived impact and application of CBM-pa. CBM-pa was regarded as easy, straightforward and enjoyable. It was well-accepted among those we interviewed, who understood the procedure as a psychological intervention. Patients reported that it increased their capacity for adopting alternative interpretations of emotionally ambiguous scenarios. Although participants all agreed on the test-like nature of the current CBM-pa format, they considered that taking part in sessions had improved their overall wellbeing. Most of them valued the computer-based interface of CBM-pa but favoured the idea of combining CBM-pa with some form of human interaction. Conclusions: CBM-pa is an acceptable intervention that was well-received by our sample of patients with paranoia. The current findings reflect positively on the acceptability and experience of CBM-pa in the target population. Patient opinion supports further development and testing of CBM-pa as a possible adjunct treatment for paranoia. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN: 90749868. Retrospectively registered on 12 May 2016. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpsychiatr/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Psychiatry | - |
dc.rights | BMC Psychiatry. Copyright © BioMed Central Ltd. | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Cognitive bias modification | - |
dc.subject | Interpretation bias | - |
dc.subject | Qualitative research | - |
dc.subject | Psychosis | - |
dc.subject | Paranoia | - |
dc.title | A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lee, TMC: tmclee@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lee, TMC=rp00564 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31337373 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC6651961 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85069789362 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 316435 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 255 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 255 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000477043000001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1471-244X | - |