File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The Effect of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Surface Neutralization on Wettability of Silane Coupling Agents and Adhesive Resin Cements

TitleThe Effect of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Surface Neutralization on Wettability of Silane Coupling Agents and Adhesive Resin Cements
Authors
KeywordsLithium disilicate ceramics
Neutralization
Wettability
3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane
bis-1,2-(triethoxysilyl)ethane
Issue Date2018
PublisherSpringer Netherlands. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/chemistry/inorganic/journal/12633
Citation
Silicon, 2018, v. 10, p. 2391-2397 How to Cite?
AbstractThis in vitro study was aimed to evaluate the possible changes in wettability of an etched glass ceramic surface to silane primers, adhesive resin and resin cement when the surface had been neutralized by a special neutralizing agent after etching. Rectangular shaped specimens were cut from the CAD blocks of an e-max lithium disilicate glass ceramic, cut specimens were sequentially polished and ultrasonically cleaned. All the specimens were etched for 20 s with 5% hydrofluoric acid and ultrasonically cleaned. Specimens were randomly assigned to one control group (without neutralization) and one treatment group (with neutralization) having 20 specimens each. The specimens of each group were further divided into two subgroups having 10 specimens each and tested to determine the effect of neutralizing agent on wettability of experimental and commercial silanes. Each subgroup specimen was tested for wettability to adhesive resin and commercial resin cement. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Neutralizing the ceramic surface did not show a significant effect on wettability to the silanes and the resin based materials, but the experimental silane showed better wettability than the commercial silane. The adhesive resin had statistically significant lower contact angle (high wettability) values than the commercial resin cement. The results of the current study suggested that the neutralizing agent did not have an impact on the wettability of the etched ceramic. However, there were differences in wetting properties of the silane primers, and adhesive resin versus resin composite luting cements.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290101
ISSN
2020 Impact Factor: 2.67
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.349
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRamakrishnaiah, R-
dc.contributor.authorAlkheraif, AA-
dc.contributor.authorDIVAKAR, DD-
dc.contributor.authorALGHAMDI, KF-
dc.contributor.authorMatinlinna, JP-
dc.contributor.authorLung, CYK-
dc.contributor.authorCHERIAN, S-
dc.contributor.authorVALLITTU, PK-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T08:22:07Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-22T08:22:07Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationSilicon, 2018, v. 10, p. 2391-2397-
dc.identifier.issn1876-990X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290101-
dc.description.abstractThis in vitro study was aimed to evaluate the possible changes in wettability of an etched glass ceramic surface to silane primers, adhesive resin and resin cement when the surface had been neutralized by a special neutralizing agent after etching. Rectangular shaped specimens were cut from the CAD blocks of an e-max lithium disilicate glass ceramic, cut specimens were sequentially polished and ultrasonically cleaned. All the specimens were etched for 20 s with 5% hydrofluoric acid and ultrasonically cleaned. Specimens were randomly assigned to one control group (without neutralization) and one treatment group (with neutralization) having 20 specimens each. The specimens of each group were further divided into two subgroups having 10 specimens each and tested to determine the effect of neutralizing agent on wettability of experimental and commercial silanes. Each subgroup specimen was tested for wettability to adhesive resin and commercial resin cement. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Neutralizing the ceramic surface did not show a significant effect on wettability to the silanes and the resin based materials, but the experimental silane showed better wettability than the commercial silane. The adhesive resin had statistically significant lower contact angle (high wettability) values than the commercial resin cement. The results of the current study suggested that the neutralizing agent did not have an impact on the wettability of the etched ceramic. However, there were differences in wetting properties of the silane primers, and adhesive resin versus resin composite luting cements.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/chemistry/inorganic/journal/12633-
dc.relation.ispartofSilicon-
dc.rightsThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in [insert journal title]. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/[insert DOI]-
dc.subjectLithium disilicate ceramics-
dc.subjectNeutralization-
dc.subjectWettability-
dc.subject3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane-
dc.subjectbis-1,2-(triethoxysilyl)ethane-
dc.titleThe Effect of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Surface Neutralization on Wettability of Silane Coupling Agents and Adhesive Resin Cements-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailMatinlinna, JP: jpmat@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLung, CYK: cyklung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMatinlinna, JP=rp00052-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12633-017-9670-6-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85043401371-
dc.identifier.hkuros315954-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.spage2391-
dc.identifier.epage2397-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000451189700001-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-
dc.identifier.issnl1876-990X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats