File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The effects of motivation on processing instruction in the acquisition of Modern Standard Arabic gender agreement

TitleThe effects of motivation on processing instruction in the acquisition of Modern Standard Arabic gender agreement
Authors
KeywordsInput processing
Processing instruction
Motivation
Gender agreement in Modern Standard Arabic
Issue Date2018
Citation
Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 2018, v. 2, n. 1, p. 61-82 How to Cite?
AbstractThe present study investigates the effects of motivation and processing instruction on the acquisition of Modern Standard Arabic gender agreement. The role of individual differences (e.g. age, gender, aptitude, language background and working memory) on the positive effects generated by processing instruction has been investigated in the last few years. However, no previous research has been conducted to measure the possible effects of motivation on L2 learners exposed to processing instruction. In addition, a reasonable question to be addressed within the processing instruction research framework is whether its positive effects can be generalised to the acquisition of Modern Standard Arabic. The Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) and the Attitude Motivation Test Battery (AMTB) motivation questionnaires were used to capture different variables that influence motivation in order to create the two different groups (high and low motivated). In this experimental study, forty-one native English school-age learners (aged 8–11) were assigned to two groups: ‘the high motivated group’ (n = 29): and the ‘low motivated group’ (n = 12). Both groups received processing instruction, which lasted for three hours. Sentence-level interpretation and production tasks were used in a pre-test and post-test design to measure instructional effects. The learners were required to fill in gaps in both written and spoken mode for the activities. The study also included a delayed post-test administered to the two groups four weeks later. The results indicated that both groups improved equally from pre-test to post-test in all assessment measures and they both retained the positive effects of the training in the delayed posttests. Processing instruction was proved to be the main factor for the improvement in performance regardless of the learner’s level of motivation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290330
ISSN
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.197

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFarhat, A-
dc.contributor.authorBenati, A-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T03:11:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-27T03:11:25Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationInstructed Second Language Acquisition, 2018, v. 2, n. 1, p. 61-82-
dc.identifier.issn2398-4155-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290330-
dc.description.abstractThe present study investigates the effects of motivation and processing instruction on the acquisition of Modern Standard Arabic gender agreement. The role of individual differences (e.g. age, gender, aptitude, language background and working memory) on the positive effects generated by processing instruction has been investigated in the last few years. However, no previous research has been conducted to measure the possible effects of motivation on L2 learners exposed to processing instruction. In addition, a reasonable question to be addressed within the processing instruction research framework is whether its positive effects can be generalised to the acquisition of Modern Standard Arabic. The Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) and the Attitude Motivation Test Battery (AMTB) motivation questionnaires were used to capture different variables that influence motivation in order to create the two different groups (high and low motivated). In this experimental study, forty-one native English school-age learners (aged 8–11) were assigned to two groups: ‘the high motivated group’ (n = 29): and the ‘low motivated group’ (n = 12). Both groups received processing instruction, which lasted for three hours. Sentence-level interpretation and production tasks were used in a pre-test and post-test design to measure instructional effects. The learners were required to fill in gaps in both written and spoken mode for the activities. The study also included a delayed post-test administered to the two groups four weeks later. The results indicated that both groups improved equally from pre-test to post-test in all assessment measures and they both retained the positive effects of the training in the delayed posttests. Processing instruction was proved to be the main factor for the improvement in performance regardless of the learner’s level of motivation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInstructed Second Language Acquisition-
dc.subjectInput processing-
dc.subjectProcessing instruction-
dc.subjectMotivation-
dc.subjectGender agreement in Modern Standard Arabic-
dc.titleThe effects of motivation on processing instruction in the acquisition of Modern Standard Arabic gender agreement-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1558/isla.34879-
dc.identifier.volume2-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage61-
dc.identifier.epage82-
dc.identifier.issnl2398-4155-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats