File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: An eye-tracking study on the effects of structured input and traditional instruction on the acquisition of English passive forms

TitleAn eye-tracking study on the effects of structured input and traditional instruction on the acquisition of English passive forms
Authors
Keywordsinput processing
processing instruction
structured input
English causative passive forms
accuracy
Issue Date2020
PublisherEquinox Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at www.equinoxpub.com/ISLA
Citation
Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 2020, v. 4 n. 2, p. 158-179 How to Cite?
AbstractThe present study explores the effects of structured input and traditional instruction on the acquisition of English passive forms using online measurements (eye-tracking). Previous empirical research investigating the effects of processing instruction through offline measurements (sentence and discourse-level) has overall shown that it is an effective pedagogical intervention. Research investigating the main factor responsible for the effectiveness of processing instruction has confirmed that it is the structured input component that is the causative factor for the positive effects of processing instruction. The two main questions of this study are: (1) What are the effects of structured input and traditional instruction on accuracy when measured by an eye-tracking picture selection task? (2) Would possible differences in accuracy between structured input and traditional instruction be accompanied by changes in eye-movement patterns? To provide answers to the questions formulated in this study, one eye-tracking study was carried out. Sixty-four school-age learners (15–16 years old) participated and were assigned to one of two groups: structured input (n = 32 or traditional instruction (n = 32). Neither instructional group received explicit information. A pre- and post-training design was adopted and the two groups received two different instructional treatments (structured input vs traditional instruction). Participants were assessed through a picture selection eye-tracking task to measure accuracy and eye-movement patterns while they were processing auditory sentences. Results of the eye-tracking task indicated that the structured input group achieved significantly higher accuracy scores compared with the group receiving traditional instruction. The main findings from the present study reveal that structured input training might cause a change in learners’ eye-movement patterns.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291085
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBenati, A-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-02T05:51:20Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-02T05:51:20Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationInstructed Second Language Acquisition, 2020, v. 4 n. 2, p. 158-179-
dc.identifier.issn2398-4155-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291085-
dc.description.abstractThe present study explores the effects of structured input and traditional instruction on the acquisition of English passive forms using online measurements (eye-tracking). Previous empirical research investigating the effects of processing instruction through offline measurements (sentence and discourse-level) has overall shown that it is an effective pedagogical intervention. Research investigating the main factor responsible for the effectiveness of processing instruction has confirmed that it is the structured input component that is the causative factor for the positive effects of processing instruction. The two main questions of this study are: (1) What are the effects of structured input and traditional instruction on accuracy when measured by an eye-tracking picture selection task? (2) Would possible differences in accuracy between structured input and traditional instruction be accompanied by changes in eye-movement patterns? To provide answers to the questions formulated in this study, one eye-tracking study was carried out. Sixty-four school-age learners (15–16 years old) participated and were assigned to one of two groups: structured input (n = 32 or traditional instruction (n = 32). Neither instructional group received explicit information. A pre- and post-training design was adopted and the two groups received two different instructional treatments (structured input vs traditional instruction). Participants were assessed through a picture selection eye-tracking task to measure accuracy and eye-movement patterns while they were processing auditory sentences. Results of the eye-tracking task indicated that the structured input group achieved significantly higher accuracy scores compared with the group receiving traditional instruction. The main findings from the present study reveal that structured input training might cause a change in learners’ eye-movement patterns.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEquinox Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at www.equinoxpub.com/ISLA-
dc.relation.ispartofInstructed Second Language Acquisition-
dc.subjectinput processing-
dc.subjectprocessing instruction-
dc.subjectstructured input-
dc.subjectEnglish causative passive forms-
dc.subjectaccuracy-
dc.titleAn eye-tracking study on the effects of structured input and traditional instruction on the acquisition of English passive forms-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailBenati, A: abenati@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBenati, A=rp02739-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1558/isla.40642-
dc.identifier.hkuros317902-
dc.identifier.volume4-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage158-
dc.identifier.epage179-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl2398-4155-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats