File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Oral prednisolone in the treatment of acute gout: A pragmatic, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial

TitleOral prednisolone in the treatment of acute gout: A pragmatic, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial
Authors
Issue Date2016
Citation
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2016, v. 164, n. 7, p. 464-471 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2016 American College of Physicians. Background: Two recent double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) showed that oral steroids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs have similar analgesic effectiveness for management of gout, but the trials had small sample sizes and other methodological limitations. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of oral prednisolone versus oral indomethacin in patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with acute gout. Design: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized equivalence trial. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either indomethacin or prednisolone. (ISRCTN registry number: ISRCTN45724113) Setting: Four EDs in Hong Kong. Participants: 416 patients aged 18 years or older. Measurements: Analgesic effectiveness was defined as changes in pain (at rest or with activity) greater than 13 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Outcomes were measured during the first 2 hours in the ED and from days 1 to 14. Results: 376 patients completed the study. Equivalent and clinically significant within-group reductions in mean pain score were observed with indomethacin and prednisolone in the ED (approximately 10 mm [rest] and 20 mm [activity]) and from days 1 to 14 (approximately 25 mm [rest] and 45 mm [activity]). No major adverse events occurred during the study. During the ED phase, patients in the indomethacin group had more minor adverse events than those in the prednisolone group (19% vs. 6%; P < 0.001). During days 1 to 14, 37% of patients in each group had minor adverse events. Limitation: Diagnosis of gout was usually based on clinical criteria rather than examination of joint fluid. Conclusion: Oral prednisolone and indomethacin had similar analgesic effectiveness among patients with acute gout. Prednisolone is a safe, effective first-line option for treatment of acute gout. Primary Funding Source: Health and Health Services Research Grant Committee of the Hong Kong Government.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292070
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 19.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.337
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRainer, Timothy Hudson-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Chi Hung-
dc.contributor.authorJanssens, Hein J.E.M.-
dc.contributor.authorMan, Chi Yin-
dc.contributor.authorTam, Lai Shan-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Yu Fai-
dc.contributor.authorYau, Wah Hon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ka Hing-
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Colin Alexander-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:55:42Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:55:42Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2016, v. 164, n. 7, p. 464-471-
dc.identifier.issn0003-4819-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292070-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 American College of Physicians. Background: Two recent double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) showed that oral steroids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs have similar analgesic effectiveness for management of gout, but the trials had small sample sizes and other methodological limitations. Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of oral prednisolone versus oral indomethacin in patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with acute gout. Design: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized equivalence trial. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either indomethacin or prednisolone. (ISRCTN registry number: ISRCTN45724113) Setting: Four EDs in Hong Kong. Participants: 416 patients aged 18 years or older. Measurements: Analgesic effectiveness was defined as changes in pain (at rest or with activity) greater than 13 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Outcomes were measured during the first 2 hours in the ED and from days 1 to 14. Results: 376 patients completed the study. Equivalent and clinically significant within-group reductions in mean pain score were observed with indomethacin and prednisolone in the ED (approximately 10 mm [rest] and 20 mm [activity]) and from days 1 to 14 (approximately 25 mm [rest] and 45 mm [activity]). No major adverse events occurred during the study. During the ED phase, patients in the indomethacin group had more minor adverse events than those in the prednisolone group (19% vs. 6%; P < 0.001). During days 1 to 14, 37% of patients in each group had minor adverse events. Limitation: Diagnosis of gout was usually based on clinical criteria rather than examination of joint fluid. Conclusion: Oral prednisolone and indomethacin had similar analgesic effectiveness among patients with acute gout. Prednisolone is a safe, effective first-line option for treatment of acute gout. Primary Funding Source: Health and Health Services Research Grant Committee of the Hong Kong Government.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Internal Medicine-
dc.titleOral prednisolone in the treatment of acute gout: A pragmatic, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.7326/M14-2070-
dc.identifier.pmid26903390-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84962635467-
dc.identifier.volume164-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage464-
dc.identifier.epage471-
dc.identifier.eissn1539-3704-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000373625300008-
dc.identifier.issnl0003-4819-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats