File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Differences in the compliance with hospital infection control practices during the 2009 influenza H1N1 pandemic in three countries

TitleDifferences in the compliance with hospital infection control practices during the 2009 influenza H1N1 pandemic in three countries
Authors
KeywordsPandemic
Compliance
Influenza
Vaccine
Infection control
Issue Date2012
Citation
Journal of Hospital Infection, 2012, v. 81, n. 2, p. 98-103 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: In December 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued updated guidelines on the prevention of H1N1 influenza virus in healthcare settings. In 2010, the WHO pandemic influenza alert level was still at phase 6. Aim: To study the practice of infection control measures during the 2009 influenza H1N1 pandemic among healthcare workers (HCWs) in three countries. Methods: A standardized, self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted in 2010 among doctors, nurses and allied HCWs in 120 hospital-based clinical departments in Hong Kong, Singapore and the UK. Questions were asked on demographics; previous experience and perceived severity of influenza; infection control practices; uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination and H1N1 vaccination. Multiple logistic regression was used to test the independent association with different factors. Findings: A total of 2100 HCWs in the three countries participated. They reported high compliance (>80%) with infection control procedures regarded as standard for droplet-transmitted infections including wearing and changing gloves, and washing hands before and after patient contact. However, the reported use of masks with indirect or direct patient contact (surgical or N95 as required by their hospital) varied considerably (96.4% and 70.4% for Hong Kong; 82.3% and 87.7% for Singapore; 25.3% and 62.0% for the UK). Reported compliance was associated with job title, number of patient contacts and perceived severity of pandemics. There was no association between the uptake for seasonal or 2009 H1N1 vaccines and compliance. Conclusions: Compliance with infection control measures for pandemic influenza appears to vary widely depending on the setting. © 2012 The Healthcare Infection Society.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292708
ISSN
2022 Impact Factor: 6.9
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.142
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChor, J. S.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorPada, S. K.-
dc.contributor.authorStephenson, I.-
dc.contributor.authorGoggins, W. B.-
dc.contributor.authorTambyah, P. A.-
dc.contributor.authorMedina, M.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, N.-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, T. F.-
dc.contributor.authorNgai, K. L.K.-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, S. K.-
dc.contributor.authorRainer, T. H.-
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, S.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, P. K.S.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:57:03Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:57:03Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Hospital Infection, 2012, v. 81, n. 2, p. 98-103-
dc.identifier.issn0195-6701-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/292708-
dc.description.abstractBackground: In December 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued updated guidelines on the prevention of H1N1 influenza virus in healthcare settings. In 2010, the WHO pandemic influenza alert level was still at phase 6. Aim: To study the practice of infection control measures during the 2009 influenza H1N1 pandemic among healthcare workers (HCWs) in three countries. Methods: A standardized, self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted in 2010 among doctors, nurses and allied HCWs in 120 hospital-based clinical departments in Hong Kong, Singapore and the UK. Questions were asked on demographics; previous experience and perceived severity of influenza; infection control practices; uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination and H1N1 vaccination. Multiple logistic regression was used to test the independent association with different factors. Findings: A total of 2100 HCWs in the three countries participated. They reported high compliance (>80%) with infection control procedures regarded as standard for droplet-transmitted infections including wearing and changing gloves, and washing hands before and after patient contact. However, the reported use of masks with indirect or direct patient contact (surgical or N95 as required by their hospital) varied considerably (96.4% and 70.4% for Hong Kong; 82.3% and 87.7% for Singapore; 25.3% and 62.0% for the UK). Reported compliance was associated with job title, number of patient contacts and perceived severity of pandemics. There was no association between the uptake for seasonal or 2009 H1N1 vaccines and compliance. Conclusions: Compliance with infection control measures for pandemic influenza appears to vary widely depending on the setting. © 2012 The Healthcare Infection Society.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Hospital Infection-
dc.subjectPandemic-
dc.subjectCompliance-
dc.subjectInfluenza-
dc.subjectVaccine-
dc.subjectInfection control-
dc.titleDifferences in the compliance with hospital infection control practices during the 2009 influenza H1N1 pandemic in three countries-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhin.2012.04.003-
dc.identifier.pmid22560251-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84861665963-
dc.identifier.volume81-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage98-
dc.identifier.epage103-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2939-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000304676400006-
dc.identifier.issnl0195-6701-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats