File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Heritability and evolvability of fitness and nonfitness traits: Lessons from livestock

TitleHeritability and evolvability of fitness and nonfitness traits: Lessons from livestock
Authors
Keywordsenvironmental variance
Additive genetic variance
fitness
cattle
genetic constraints
Issue Date2016
Citation
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2016, v. 70, n. 8, p. 1770-1779 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2016 The Author(s). Evolution © 2016 The Society for the Study of Evolution. Data from natural populations have suggested a disconnection between trait heritability (variance standardized additive genetic variance, VA ) and evolvability (mean standardized VA ) and emphasized the importance of environmental variation as a determinant of trait heritability but not evolvability. However, these inferences are based on heterogeneous and often small datasets across species from different environments. We surveyed the relationship between evolvability and heritability in >100 traits in farmed cattle, taking advantage of large sample sizes and consistent genetic approaches. Heritability and evolvability estimates were positively correlated (r = 0.37/0.54 on untransformed/log scales) reflecting a substantial impact of VA on both measures. Furthermore, heritabilities and residual variances were uncorrelated. The differences between this and previously described patterns may reflect lower environmental variation experienced in farmed systems, but also low and heterogeneous quality of data from natural populations. Similar to studies on wild populations, heritabilities for life-history and behavioral traits were lower than for other traits. Traits having extremely low heritabilities and evolvabilities (17% of the studied traits) were almost exclusively life-history or behavioral traits, suggesting that evolutionary constraints stemming from lack of genetic variability are likely to be most common for classical "fitness" (cf. life-history) rather than for "nonfitness" (cf. morphological) traits.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293038
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Ary A.-
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, Juha-
dc.contributor.authorKristensen, Torsten N.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:57:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:57:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationEvolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2016, v. 70, n. 8, p. 1770-1779-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293038-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 The Author(s). Evolution © 2016 The Society for the Study of Evolution. Data from natural populations have suggested a disconnection between trait heritability (variance standardized additive genetic variance, VA ) and evolvability (mean standardized VA ) and emphasized the importance of environmental variation as a determinant of trait heritability but not evolvability. However, these inferences are based on heterogeneous and often small datasets across species from different environments. We surveyed the relationship between evolvability and heritability in >100 traits in farmed cattle, taking advantage of large sample sizes and consistent genetic approaches. Heritability and evolvability estimates were positively correlated (r = 0.37/0.54 on untransformed/log scales) reflecting a substantial impact of VA on both measures. Furthermore, heritabilities and residual variances were uncorrelated. The differences between this and previously described patterns may reflect lower environmental variation experienced in farmed systems, but also low and heterogeneous quality of data from natural populations. Similar to studies on wild populations, heritabilities for life-history and behavioral traits were lower than for other traits. Traits having extremely low heritabilities and evolvabilities (17% of the studied traits) were almost exclusively life-history or behavioral traits, suggesting that evolutionary constraints stemming from lack of genetic variability are likely to be most common for classical "fitness" (cf. life-history) rather than for "nonfitness" (cf. morphological) traits.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEvolution; international journal of organic evolution-
dc.subjectenvironmental variance-
dc.subjectAdditive genetic variance-
dc.subjectfitness-
dc.subjectcattle-
dc.subjectgenetic constraints-
dc.titleHeritability and evolvability of fitness and nonfitness traits: Lessons from livestock-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/evo.12992-
dc.identifier.pmid27346243-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85027957930-
dc.identifier.volume70-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage1770-
dc.identifier.epage1779-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-5646-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000381205700007-
dc.identifier.issnl0014-3820-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats