File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Structure and stability of genetic variance–covariance matrices: A Bayesian sparse factor analysis of transcriptional variation in the three-spined stickleback

TitleStructure and stability of genetic variance–covariance matrices: A Bayesian sparse factor analysis of transcriptional variation in the three-spined stickleback
Authors
Keywordstranscriptomics
G-matrix
genetic correlation
dimensionality
quantitative genetics
Gasterosteus aculeatus
phenomics
Issue Date2017
Citation
Molecular Ecology, 2017, v. 26, n. 19, p. 5099-5113 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd The genetic variance–covariance matrix (G) is a quantity of central importance in evolutionary biology due to its influence on the rate and direction of multivariate evolution. However, the predictive power of empirically estimated G-matrices is limited for two reasons. First, phenotypes are high-dimensional, whereas traditional statistical methods are tuned to estimate and analyse low-dimensional matrices. Second, the stability of G to environmental effects and over time remains poorly understood. Using Bayesian sparse factor analysis (BSFG) designed to estimate high-dimensional G-matrices, we analysed levels variation and covariation in 10,527 expressed genes in a large (n = 563) half-sib breeding design of three-spined sticklebacks subject to two temperature treatments. We found significant differences in the structure of G between the treatments: heritabilities and evolvabilities were higher in the warm than in the low-temperature treatment, suggesting more and faster opportunity to evolve in warm (stressful) conditions. Furthermore, comparison of G and its phenotypic equivalent P revealed the latter is a poor substitute of the former. Most strikingly, the results suggest that the expected impact of G on evolvability—as well as the similarity among G-matrices—may depend strongly on the number of traits included into analyses. In our results, the inclusion of only few traits in the analyses leads to underestimation in the differences between the G-matrices and their predicted impacts on evolution. While the results highlight the challenges involved in estimating G, they also illustrate that by enabling the estimation of large G-matrices, the BSFG method can improve predicted evolutionary responses to selection.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293048
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.705
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSiren, J.-
dc.contributor.authorOvaskainen, O.-
dc.contributor.authorMerilä, J.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T14:57:46Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-17T14:57:46Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationMolecular Ecology, 2017, v. 26, n. 19, p. 5099-5113-
dc.identifier.issn0962-1083-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293048-
dc.description.abstract© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd The genetic variance–covariance matrix (G) is a quantity of central importance in evolutionary biology due to its influence on the rate and direction of multivariate evolution. However, the predictive power of empirically estimated G-matrices is limited for two reasons. First, phenotypes are high-dimensional, whereas traditional statistical methods are tuned to estimate and analyse low-dimensional matrices. Second, the stability of G to environmental effects and over time remains poorly understood. Using Bayesian sparse factor analysis (BSFG) designed to estimate high-dimensional G-matrices, we analysed levels variation and covariation in 10,527 expressed genes in a large (n = 563) half-sib breeding design of three-spined sticklebacks subject to two temperature treatments. We found significant differences in the structure of G between the treatments: heritabilities and evolvabilities were higher in the warm than in the low-temperature treatment, suggesting more and faster opportunity to evolve in warm (stressful) conditions. Furthermore, comparison of G and its phenotypic equivalent P revealed the latter is a poor substitute of the former. Most strikingly, the results suggest that the expected impact of G on evolvability—as well as the similarity among G-matrices—may depend strongly on the number of traits included into analyses. In our results, the inclusion of only few traits in the analyses leads to underestimation in the differences between the G-matrices and their predicted impacts on evolution. While the results highlight the challenges involved in estimating G, they also illustrate that by enabling the estimation of large G-matrices, the BSFG method can improve predicted evolutionary responses to selection.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMolecular Ecology-
dc.subjecttranscriptomics-
dc.subjectG-matrix-
dc.subjectgenetic correlation-
dc.subjectdimensionality-
dc.subjectquantitative genetics-
dc.subjectGasterosteus aculeatus-
dc.subjectphenomics-
dc.titleStructure and stability of genetic variance–covariance matrices: A Bayesian sparse factor analysis of transcriptional variation in the three-spined stickleback-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/mec.14265-
dc.identifier.pmid28746754-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85031716602-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue19-
dc.identifier.spage5099-
dc.identifier.epage5113-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-294X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000413375500019-
dc.identifier.issnl0962-1083-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats