File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Specificity, Conflict, and Focal Point: A Systematic Investigation into Social Media Censorship in China

TitleSpecificity, Conflict, and Focal Point: A Systematic Investigation into Social Media Censorship in China
Authors
KeywordsChina
Internet Censorship
Public Sphere
Social Media
WeChat
Issue Date2020
PublisherOxford University Press: Policy F. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/joc
Citation
Journal of Communication, 2020, v. 70 n. 6, p. 842-867 How to Cite?
AbstractInternet censorship mechanisms in China are highly dynamic and yet to be fully accounted for by existing theories. This study interrogates postpublication censorship on Chinese social media by examining the differences between 2,280 pairs of censored WeChat articles and matched remaining articles. With the effects of account attributes and article topics excluded, we find that article specificity raises the odds of being censored. Also, an examination on a collection of international trade articles indicates that such articles with textual units disclosing conflicts, even pro-regime messages, are also removed by the censors. This mixed-method study introduces focal point as a theoretical angle to understand China’s contextually contingent content regulation system and offers evidence based on large-scale, nonproprietary, and original social media data to investigate the evolving censorship mechanisms in China.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293195
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.750
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.752
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTai, Y-
dc.contributor.authorFu, KW-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T08:13:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-23T08:13:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Communication, 2020, v. 70 n. 6, p. 842-867-
dc.identifier.issn0021-9916-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293195-
dc.description.abstractInternet censorship mechanisms in China are highly dynamic and yet to be fully accounted for by existing theories. This study interrogates postpublication censorship on Chinese social media by examining the differences between 2,280 pairs of censored WeChat articles and matched remaining articles. With the effects of account attributes and article topics excluded, we find that article specificity raises the odds of being censored. Also, an examination on a collection of international trade articles indicates that such articles with textual units disclosing conflicts, even pro-regime messages, are also removed by the censors. This mixed-method study introduces focal point as a theoretical angle to understand China’s contextually contingent content regulation system and offers evidence based on large-scale, nonproprietary, and original social media data to investigate the evolving censorship mechanisms in China.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press: Policy F. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/joc-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Communication-
dc.rightsThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The version of record [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: xxxxxxx [insert URL and DOI of the article on the OUP website].-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectInternet Censorship-
dc.subjectPublic Sphere-
dc.subjectSocial Media-
dc.subjectWeChat-
dc.titleSpecificity, Conflict, and Focal Point: A Systematic Investigation into Social Media Censorship in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailFu, KW: kwfu@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityFu, KW=rp00552-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/joc/jqaa032-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85100970960-
dc.identifier.hkuros319492-
dc.identifier.volume70-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage842-
dc.identifier.epage867-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000607163800005-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats