File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Mediation Privilege

TitleMediation Privilege
Authors
Meggitt, G
Issue Date2020
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Citation
Mediation Privilege. In Moscati, MF ; Palmer, M & Roberts, M (Eds.), Comparative Dispute Resolution, p. 231-247. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781786433039.00023
AbstractIt is widely accepted by practicing lawyers, legal academics, the courts, businesses, governments and other interested parties that mediation is “confidential” and “privileged”. Some, however, deny that this is or should be so. Further, there is little consensus – even among those who support its existence - over the nature of this confidentiality or privilege; who may claim it; and against whom it may be claimed. This chapter examines the arguments in favour and against “mediation privilege” in a number of leading common law jurisdictions. It reaches the conclusion that the very nature and philosophy of mediation itself provides sufficient justification for the existence of a “mediation privilege
DescriptionChapter 15
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293993
ISBN
9781786433022

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeggitt, G-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T08:24:47Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-23T08:24:47Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationMediation Privilege. In Moscati, MF ; Palmer, M & Roberts, M (Eds.), Comparative Dispute Resolution, p. 231-247. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020-
dc.identifier.isbn9781786433022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/293993-
dc.descriptionChapter 15-
dc.description.abstractIt is widely accepted by practicing lawyers, legal academics, the courts, businesses, governments and other interested parties that mediation is “confidential” and “privileged”. Some, however, deny that this is or should be so. Further, there is little consensus – even among those who support its existence - over the nature of this confidentiality or privilege; who may claim it; and against whom it may be claimed. This chapter examines the arguments in favour and against “mediation privilege” in a number of leading common law jurisdictions. It reaches the conclusion that the very nature and philosophy of mediation itself provides sufficient justification for the existence of a “mediation privilege-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEdward Elgar Publishing-
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Dispute Resolution-
dc.titleMediation Privilege-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailMeggitt, G: garym@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMeggitt, G=rp01284-
dc.identifier.doi10.4337/9781786433039.00023-
dc.identifier.hkuros318846-
dc.identifier.spage231-
dc.identifier.epage247-
dc.publisher.placeCheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats