File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Proper positioning of mice for Cobb angle radiographic measurements

TitleProper positioning of mice for Cobb angle radiographic measurements
Authors
KeywordsScoliosis
Mouse
Radiograph
Cobb angle
Positioning
Issue Date2021
PublisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmusculoskeletdisord/
Citation
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2021, v. 22 n. 1, p. article no. 72 How to Cite?
AbstractBackgroundThere is no recommended standard for positioning of a mouse for radiographic assessment of the spine. This is necessary to have reproducible radiographic data and avoid false positive results. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of various postures on Cobb angle measurements and to set up a positioning standard for imaging mouse spines.MethodsThis study was conducted in three parts. Firstly, we identified the problem of lack of posture standardization for radiographs. We collected 77 C57BL/6J mice for spine radiographs and found a scoliosis prevalence of 28.6% with large variations in curve magnitude. Secondly, 24 C57BL/6J mice underwent 4 consecutive weekly radiographs and observed high variations (relative standard deviation: 125.3%) between radiographs. Thirdly, we collected another 82 C57BL/6J mice and designed 14 different postures that could take place during imaging. These postures were related to curling of the limbs, and head, pelvic and tail tilting.ResultsThe results showed that head and pelvic tilting significantly affects the curve magnitude with effect size (Glass's delta) over 1.50. Avoiding these incorrect positions during radiographs is warranted. The standard recommended posture for mouse imaging entails positioning the snout, interorbital space, neck and whole spine in one line, and with the limbs placed symmetrical to the trunk, whilst avoiding stretching the body of the mouse.ConclusionsOur work exemplified the importance of standard protocol during imaging when using an animal model in the scoliosis study. We recommend utilizing this standard in studying various disorders of the spine to avoid technical causes for the appearance of a curve.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/295766
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.562
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.837
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCHEN, Z-
dc.contributor.authorLuk, KDK-
dc.contributor.authorSong, YQ-
dc.contributor.authorGao, B-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, JPY-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-08T08:13:42Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-08T08:13:42Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2021, v. 22 n. 1, p. article no. 72-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2474-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/295766-
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThere is no recommended standard for positioning of a mouse for radiographic assessment of the spine. This is necessary to have reproducible radiographic data and avoid false positive results. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of various postures on Cobb angle measurements and to set up a positioning standard for imaging mouse spines.MethodsThis study was conducted in three parts. Firstly, we identified the problem of lack of posture standardization for radiographs. We collected 77 C57BL/6J mice for spine radiographs and found a scoliosis prevalence of 28.6% with large variations in curve magnitude. Secondly, 24 C57BL/6J mice underwent 4 consecutive weekly radiographs and observed high variations (relative standard deviation: 125.3%) between radiographs. Thirdly, we collected another 82 C57BL/6J mice and designed 14 different postures that could take place during imaging. These postures were related to curling of the limbs, and head, pelvic and tail tilting.ResultsThe results showed that head and pelvic tilting significantly affects the curve magnitude with effect size (Glass's delta) over 1.50. Avoiding these incorrect positions during radiographs is warranted. The standard recommended posture for mouse imaging entails positioning the snout, interorbital space, neck and whole spine in one line, and with the limbs placed symmetrical to the trunk, whilst avoiding stretching the body of the mouse.ConclusionsOur work exemplified the importance of standard protocol during imaging when using an animal model in the scoliosis study. We recommend utilizing this standard in studying various disorders of the spine to avoid technical causes for the appearance of a curve.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmusculoskeletdisord/-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders-
dc.rightsBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. Copyright © BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectScoliosis-
dc.subjectMouse-
dc.subjectRadiograph-
dc.subjectCobb angle-
dc.subjectPositioning-
dc.titleProper positioning of mice for Cobb angle radiographic measurements-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailSong, YQ: songy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailGao, B: gaobo@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, JPY: cheungjp@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLuk, KDK=rp00333-
dc.identifier.authoritySong, YQ=rp00488-
dc.identifier.authorityGao, B=rp02012-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, JPY=rp01685-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12891-021-03949-8-
dc.identifier.pmid33435951-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7805199-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85099249392-
dc.identifier.hkuros321140-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 72-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 72-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000609614000007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats