File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: How well are we managing fragility hip fractures? A narrative report on the review with the attempt to set up a fragility fracture registry in Hong Kong

TitleHow well are we managing fragility hip fractures? A narrative report on the review with the attempt to set up a fragility fracture registry in Hong Kong
我們治理脆性髖部骨折是否理想?一個根據脆性骨折登記冊數據的敘述報告
Authors
Issue Date2017
Citation
Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2017, v. 23, n. 3, p. 264-271 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: In setting up a disease registry for fragility fractures in Hong Kong, we conducted a retrospective systematic study on the management of fragility hip fractures. Patient outcomes were compared with the standards from our orthopaedic working group and those from the British Orthopaedic Association that runs a mature fracture registry in the United Kingdom. Methods: Clinical data on fragility hip fracture patients admitted to six acute major hospitals in Hong Kong in 2012 were captured. These included demographics, pre- and post-operative assessments, discharge details, complications, and 1-year follow-up information. Analysis was performed according to the local standards with reference to those from the British Orthopaedic Association. Results: Overall, 91.0% of patients received orthopaedic care within 4 hours of admission and 60.5% received surgery within 48 hours. Preoperative geri-orthopaedic co-management was received by 3.5% of patients and was one of the reasons for the delayed surgery in 22% of patients. Only 22.9% were discharged with medication that would promote bone health. Institutionalisation on discharge significantly increased by 16.2% (P<0.001). Only 35.1% of patients attended out-patient follow-up 1 year following fracture, and mobility had deteriorated in 69.9% compared with the premorbid state. Death occurred in 17.3% of patients within a year of surgery compared with 1.6% mortality rate in a Hong Kong age-matched population. Conclusions: The efficiency and quality of acute care for fragility hip fracture patients was documented. Regular geri-orthopaedic co-management can enhance acute care. Much effort is needed to improve functional recovery, prescription of bone health medications, attendance for follow-up, and to decrease institutionalisation. A Fracture Liaison Service is vital to improve long-term care and prevent secondary fractures.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296146
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.256
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.357
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, K. S.-
dc.contributor.authorYuen, W. F.-
dc.contributor.authorNgai, W. K.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, C. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorLau, T. W.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, K. B.-
dc.contributor.authorSiu, K. M.-
dc.contributor.authorTang, N.-
dc.contributor.authorWong, S. H.-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, W. H.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T04:52:56Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-11T04:52:56Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Medical Journal, 2017, v. 23, n. 3, p. 264-271-
dc.identifier.issn1024-2708-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296146-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: In setting up a disease registry for fragility fractures in Hong Kong, we conducted a retrospective systematic study on the management of fragility hip fractures. Patient outcomes were compared with the standards from our orthopaedic working group and those from the British Orthopaedic Association that runs a mature fracture registry in the United Kingdom. Methods: Clinical data on fragility hip fracture patients admitted to six acute major hospitals in Hong Kong in 2012 were captured. These included demographics, pre- and post-operative assessments, discharge details, complications, and 1-year follow-up information. Analysis was performed according to the local standards with reference to those from the British Orthopaedic Association. Results: Overall, 91.0% of patients received orthopaedic care within 4 hours of admission and 60.5% received surgery within 48 hours. Preoperative geri-orthopaedic co-management was received by 3.5% of patients and was one of the reasons for the delayed surgery in 22% of patients. Only 22.9% were discharged with medication that would promote bone health. Institutionalisation on discharge significantly increased by 16.2% (P<0.001). Only 35.1% of patients attended out-patient follow-up 1 year following fracture, and mobility had deteriorated in 69.9% compared with the premorbid state. Death occurred in 17.3% of patients within a year of surgery compared with 1.6% mortality rate in a Hong Kong age-matched population. Conclusions: The efficiency and quality of acute care for fragility hip fracture patients was documented. Regular geri-orthopaedic co-management can enhance acute care. Much effort is needed to improve functional recovery, prescription of bone health medications, attendance for follow-up, and to decrease institutionalisation. A Fracture Liaison Service is vital to improve long-term care and prevent secondary fractures.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Medical Journal-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleHow well are we managing fragility hip fractures? A narrative report on the review with the attempt to set up a fragility fracture registry in Hong Kong-
dc.title我們治理脆性髖部骨折是否理想?一個根據脆性骨折登記冊數據的敘述報告-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.12809/hkmj166124-
dc.identifier.pmid28473651-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85020299772-
dc.identifier.hkuros323572-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage264-
dc.identifier.epage271-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000402949300010-
dc.identifier.issnl1024-2708-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats