File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2841321
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85047645070
- WOS: WOS:000435522600025
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparing Community Detection Algorithms in Transport Networks via Points of Interest
Title | Comparing Community Detection Algorithms in Transport Networks via Points of Interest |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | points of interest logistic regression mobility flow Community detection |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | IEEE Access, 2018, v. 6, p. 29729-29738 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Passengers travel in transport networks with diverse interests represented by linked points of interest (POIs) and drive urban regions to group into network communities. Previous studies focused on applying community detection methods (CDMs) to discover spatial mobility patterns or using POIs to explain the decision making of human mobility, without comparing the effectiveness of CDMs for detecting network communities. In this paper, we analyze the relationship between POIs and network communities of human mobility over diverse CDMs. Taking the taxi systems of Shanghai and Beijing as case studies, we construct transport networks with urban regions as nodes and the connections between them as links weighted by mobility flows. The spatial communities are identified based on the movement strength among regions. POIs are mapped into nodes in the network and are considered as independent variables for classifying the spatial community categories. Our study suggests that communities detected with two specific CMDs (namely, the Combo algorithm and the Walktrap algorithm) correlate to POIs, and the correlation of the Combo is the best ( R^{2}=0.3 for Shanghai and R^{2}=0.48 for Beijing). In this regard, this paper can provide valuable insight into understanding the formation of spatial communities and assist in selecting reasonable CDMs. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/296173 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Liping | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Yongjian | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gao, Hepeng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhao, Xuehua | - |
dc.contributor.author | Du, Zhanwei | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-11T04:52:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-11T04:52:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | IEEE Access, 2018, v. 6, p. 29729-29738 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/296173 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Passengers travel in transport networks with diverse interests represented by linked points of interest (POIs) and drive urban regions to group into network communities. Previous studies focused on applying community detection methods (CDMs) to discover spatial mobility patterns or using POIs to explain the decision making of human mobility, without comparing the effectiveness of CDMs for detecting network communities. In this paper, we analyze the relationship between POIs and network communities of human mobility over diverse CDMs. Taking the taxi systems of Shanghai and Beijing as case studies, we construct transport networks with urban regions as nodes and the connections between them as links weighted by mobility flows. The spatial communities are identified based on the movement strength among regions. POIs are mapped into nodes in the network and are considered as independent variables for classifying the spatial community categories. Our study suggests that communities detected with two specific CMDs (namely, the Combo algorithm and the Walktrap algorithm) correlate to POIs, and the correlation of the Combo is the best ( R^{2}=0.3 for Shanghai and R^{2}=0.48 for Beijing). In this regard, this paper can provide valuable insight into understanding the formation of spatial communities and assist in selecting reasonable CDMs. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | IEEE Access | - |
dc.rights | © 2018 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only. Personal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information | - |
dc.subject | points of interest | - |
dc.subject | logistic regression | - |
dc.subject | mobility flow | - |
dc.subject | Community detection | - |
dc.title | Comparing Community Detection Algorithms in Transport Networks via Points of Interest | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2841321 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85047645070 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 29729 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 29738 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2169-3536 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000435522600025 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2169-3536 | - |