File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Reading High Breast Density Mammograms: Differences in Diagnostic Performance between Radiologists from Hong Kong SAR/Guangdong Province in China and Australia.

TitleReading High Breast Density Mammograms: Differences in Diagnostic Performance between Radiologists from Hong Kong SAR/Guangdong Province in China and Australia.
Authors
KeywordsBreast Cancer Screening
Sensitivity
Specificity
breast image reading
mammography
Issue Date2020
PublisherAsian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention. The Journal's web site is located at http://journal.waocp.org/
Citation
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2020, v. 21 n. 9, p. 2623-2629 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Variations in the performance of radiologists reading mammographic images are well reported, but key parameters explaining such variations in different countries are not fully explored. The main aim of this study is to investigate performances of Chinese (Hong Kong SAR and Guangdong Province) and Australian radiologists in interpreting dense breast mammographic images. Methods: A test set, contained 60 mammographic examinations with high breast density, was used to assess radiologists' performance. Twelve Chinese and thirteen Australian radiologists read all the cases independently and were asked to identify all lesions and provide a grade from 1 to 5 to each lesion. Case sensitivity, specificity, lesion sensitivity, AUC and JAFROC were used to assess radiologists' performances. Demographic information and reading experience were also collected from the readers. Performance scores were compared between the two populations and the relationships between performance scores and their reading experience were discovered. Results: For radiologists who were less than 40-year-old, lesion sensitivity, AUC and JAFROC were significantly lower in Chinese radiologists than those in Australian (52.10% vs 71.45%, p=0.043; 0.76 vs 0.84, p=0.031; 0.59 vs 0.72, p=0.045; respectively). Australian radiologists with less than 10 years of reading experience had higher AUC and JAFROC scores compared with their Chinese counterparts (0.83 vs 0.76, p=0.039; 0.70 vs 0.56, p=0.020, respectively). Conclusions: We found that younger Australian radiologists performed better at reading dense breast cases which is likely to be linked to intensive fellowship training, immersion in a screening program and exposure to the benefits of a performance-measuring education tool.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296361
ISSN
2014 Impact Factor: 2.514
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.512
PubMed Central ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, T-
dc.contributor.authorTaba, ST-
dc.contributor.authorKhong, PL-
dc.contributor.authorTan, TXL-
dc.contributor.authorTrieu, PDT-
dc.contributor.authorChan, E-
dc.contributor.authorSuleiman, ME-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Y-
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, P-
dc.contributor.authorLewis, S-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-22T04:54:12Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-22T04:54:12Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2020, v. 21 n. 9, p. 2623-2629-
dc.identifier.issn1513-7368-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296361-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Variations in the performance of radiologists reading mammographic images are well reported, but key parameters explaining such variations in different countries are not fully explored. The main aim of this study is to investigate performances of Chinese (Hong Kong SAR and Guangdong Province) and Australian radiologists in interpreting dense breast mammographic images. Methods: A test set, contained 60 mammographic examinations with high breast density, was used to assess radiologists' performance. Twelve Chinese and thirteen Australian radiologists read all the cases independently and were asked to identify all lesions and provide a grade from 1 to 5 to each lesion. Case sensitivity, specificity, lesion sensitivity, AUC and JAFROC were used to assess radiologists' performances. Demographic information and reading experience were also collected from the readers. Performance scores were compared between the two populations and the relationships between performance scores and their reading experience were discovered. Results: For radiologists who were less than 40-year-old, lesion sensitivity, AUC and JAFROC were significantly lower in Chinese radiologists than those in Australian (52.10% vs 71.45%, p=0.043; 0.76 vs 0.84, p=0.031; 0.59 vs 0.72, p=0.045; respectively). Australian radiologists with less than 10 years of reading experience had higher AUC and JAFROC scores compared with their Chinese counterparts (0.83 vs 0.76, p=0.039; 0.70 vs 0.56, p=0.020, respectively). Conclusions: We found that younger Australian radiologists performed better at reading dense breast cases which is likely to be linked to intensive fellowship training, immersion in a screening program and exposure to the benefits of a performance-measuring education tool.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAsian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention. The Journal's web site is located at http://journal.waocp.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBreast Cancer Screening-
dc.subjectSensitivity-
dc.subjectSpecificity-
dc.subjectbreast image reading-
dc.subjectmammography-
dc.titleReading High Breast Density Mammograms: Differences in Diagnostic Performance between Radiologists from Hong Kong SAR/Guangdong Province in China and Australia.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailKhong, PL: plkhong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKhong, PL=rp00467-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.9.2623-
dc.identifier.pmid32986361-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7779441-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85092026957-
dc.identifier.hkuros321447-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage2623-
dc.identifier.epage2629-
dc.publisher.placeThailand-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats