File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A network approach to prioritize conservation efforts for migratory birds

TitleA network approach to prioritize conservation efforts for migratory birds
Authors
Keywordsdesignación de conservación
bird migration
network
migración de aves
conectividad
redes
habitat loss
connectivity
conservation designation
pérdida de hábitat
Issue Date2020
Citation
Conservation Biology, 2020, v. 34, n. 2, p. 416-426 How to Cite?
AbstractHabitat loss can trigger migration network collapse by isolating migratory bird breeding grounds from nonbreeding grounds. Theoretically, habitat loss can have vastly different impacts depending on the site's importance within the migratory corridor. However, migration-network connectivity and the impacts of site loss are not completely understood. We used GPS tracking data on 4 bird species in the Asian flyways to construct migration networks and proposed a framework for assessing network connectivity for migratory species. We used a node-removal process to identify stopover sites with the highest impact on connectivity. In general, migration networks with fewer stopover sites were more vulnerable to habitat loss. Node removal in order from the highest to lowest degree of habitat loss yielded an increase of network resistance similar to random removal. In contrast, resistance increased more rapidly when removing nodes in order from the highest to lowest betweenness value (quantified by the number of shortest paths passing through the specific node). We quantified the risk of migration network collapse and identified crucial sites by first selecting sites with large contributions to network connectivity and then identifying which of those sites were likely to be removed from the network (i.e., sites with habitat loss). Among these crucial sites, 42% were not designated as protected areas. Setting priorities for site protection should account for a site's position in the migration network, rather than only site-specific characteristics. Our framework for assessing migration-network connectivity enables site prioritization for conservation of migratory species.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296486
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 7.563
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.200
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXu, Yanjie-
dc.contributor.authorSi, Yali-
dc.contributor.authorTakekawa, John-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Qiang-
dc.contributor.authorPrins, Herbert H.T.-
dc.contributor.authorYin, Shenglai-
dc.contributor.authorProsser, Diann J.-
dc.contributor.authorGong, Peng-
dc.contributor.authorde Boer, Willem F.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T15:16:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-25T15:16:00Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationConservation Biology, 2020, v. 34, n. 2, p. 416-426-
dc.identifier.issn0888-8892-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296486-
dc.description.abstractHabitat loss can trigger migration network collapse by isolating migratory bird breeding grounds from nonbreeding grounds. Theoretically, habitat loss can have vastly different impacts depending on the site's importance within the migratory corridor. However, migration-network connectivity and the impacts of site loss are not completely understood. We used GPS tracking data on 4 bird species in the Asian flyways to construct migration networks and proposed a framework for assessing network connectivity for migratory species. We used a node-removal process to identify stopover sites with the highest impact on connectivity. In general, migration networks with fewer stopover sites were more vulnerable to habitat loss. Node removal in order from the highest to lowest degree of habitat loss yielded an increase of network resistance similar to random removal. In contrast, resistance increased more rapidly when removing nodes in order from the highest to lowest betweenness value (quantified by the number of shortest paths passing through the specific node). We quantified the risk of migration network collapse and identified crucial sites by first selecting sites with large contributions to network connectivity and then identifying which of those sites were likely to be removed from the network (i.e., sites with habitat loss). Among these crucial sites, 42% were not designated as protected areas. Setting priorities for site protection should account for a site's position in the migration network, rather than only site-specific characteristics. Our framework for assessing migration-network connectivity enables site prioritization for conservation of migratory species.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofConservation Biology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectdesignación de conservación-
dc.subjectbird migration-
dc.subjectnetwork-
dc.subjectmigración de aves-
dc.subjectconectividad-
dc.subjectredes-
dc.subjecthabitat loss-
dc.subjectconnectivity-
dc.subjectconservation designation-
dc.subjectpérdida de hábitat-
dc.titleA network approach to prioritize conservation efforts for migratory birds-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cobi.13383-
dc.identifier.pmid31268188-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7154769-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85070742281-
dc.identifier.volume34-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage416-
dc.identifier.epage426-
dc.identifier.eissn1523-1739-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000481507500001-
dc.identifier.issnl0888-8892-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats