File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Wavelet transform applied to EO-1 hyperspectral data for forest LAI and crown closure mapping

TitleWavelet transform applied to EO-1 hyperspectral data for forest LAI and crown closure mapping
Authors
KeywordsCrown closure
Wavelet transform
Feature extraction
Hyperion
Leaf area index
Issue Date2004
Citation
Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, v. 91, n. 2, p. 212-224 How to Cite?
AbstractA comparison of the performance of three feature extraction methods was made for mapping forest crown closure (CC) and leaf area index (LAI) with EO-1 Hyperion data. The methods are band selection (SB), principal component analysis (PCA) and wavelet transform (WT). Hyperion data were acquired on October 9, 2001. A total of 38 field measurements of CC and LAI were collected on August 10-11, 2001, at Blodgett Forest Research Station, University of California at Berkeley, USA. The analysis method consists of (1) conducting atmospheric correction with High Accuracy Atmospheric Correction for Hyperspectral Data (HATCH) to retrieve surface reflectance, (2) extracting features with the three methods: SB, PCA and WT, (3) establishing multivariate regression prediction models, (4) predicting and mapping pixel-based CC and LAI values, and (5) validating the CC and LAI mapped results with photo-interpreted CC and LAI values. The experimental results indicate that the energy features extracted by the WT method are the most effective for mapping forest CC and LAI (mapped accuracy (MA) for CC=84.90%, LAI MA=75.39%), followed by the PCA method (CC MA=77.42%, LAI MA=52.36%). The SB method performed the worst (CC MA=57.77%, LAI MA=50.87%). © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296574
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 11.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.310
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPu, Ruiliang-
dc.contributor.authorGong, Peng-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T15:16:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-25T15:16:11Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing of Environment, 2004, v. 91, n. 2, p. 212-224-
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296574-
dc.description.abstractA comparison of the performance of three feature extraction methods was made for mapping forest crown closure (CC) and leaf area index (LAI) with EO-1 Hyperion data. The methods are band selection (SB), principal component analysis (PCA) and wavelet transform (WT). Hyperion data were acquired on October 9, 2001. A total of 38 field measurements of CC and LAI were collected on August 10-11, 2001, at Blodgett Forest Research Station, University of California at Berkeley, USA. The analysis method consists of (1) conducting atmospheric correction with High Accuracy Atmospheric Correction for Hyperspectral Data (HATCH) to retrieve surface reflectance, (2) extracting features with the three methods: SB, PCA and WT, (3) establishing multivariate regression prediction models, (4) predicting and mapping pixel-based CC and LAI values, and (5) validating the CC and LAI mapped results with photo-interpreted CC and LAI values. The experimental results indicate that the energy features extracted by the WT method are the most effective for mapping forest CC and LAI (mapped accuracy (MA) for CC=84.90%, LAI MA=75.39%), followed by the PCA method (CC MA=77.42%, LAI MA=52.36%). The SB method performed the worst (CC MA=57.77%, LAI MA=50.87%). © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing of Environment-
dc.subjectCrown closure-
dc.subjectWavelet transform-
dc.subjectFeature extraction-
dc.subjectHyperion-
dc.subjectLeaf area index-
dc.titleWavelet transform applied to EO-1 hyperspectral data for forest LAI and crown closure mapping-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.006-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-2542594695-
dc.identifier.volume91-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage212-
dc.identifier.epage224-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000222006000008-
dc.identifier.issnl0034-4257-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats