File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Determination of burnt scars using logistic regression and neural network techniques from a single post-fire Landsat 7 ETM+ image

TitleDetermination of burnt scars using logistic regression and neural network techniques from a single post-fire Landsat 7 ETM+ image
Authors
Issue Date2004
Citation
Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2004, v. 70, n. 7, p. 841-850 How to Cite?
AbstractUsing logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (NN) algorithms, probabilities of presence/absence (p/a) of burned scars were calculated from post-fire Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus (ETM+) images in mountainous areas of northern California. The discriminating power of six original TM bands (TM bands 1 through 5 and band 7) and five vegetation indices between burned and unburned areas were analyzed. The LR and NN techniques were applied to two study sites with varied topography. We evaluated the performance of both methods in predicting burned scars based on predictive accuracy, uncertainty index, and computation time. The experimental results indicate that (1) the LR is more efficient than the NN in predicting burned scars, but both techniques can produce similar and acceptable prediction accuracy (overall average accuracy greater than 97 percent for both methods at the two study sites) of p/a of burned areas; (2) among all six original TM bands and five vegetation indices, original TM4 and TM7 and NDVI1 (TM4, TM7) and NDV12 (TM4, TM3) exhibit the highest discrimination between burned scars and unburned vegetation areas; and (3) the predictive accuracy produced with samples from the shaded and shadowed areas is lower than that from the sunlit areas.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296622
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.309
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPu, Ruiliang-
dc.contributor.authorGong, Peng-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-25T15:16:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-25T15:16:17Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationPhotogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2004, v. 70, n. 7, p. 841-850-
dc.identifier.issn0099-1112-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/296622-
dc.description.abstractUsing logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (NN) algorithms, probabilities of presence/absence (p/a) of burned scars were calculated from post-fire Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus (ETM+) images in mountainous areas of northern California. The discriminating power of six original TM bands (TM bands 1 through 5 and band 7) and five vegetation indices between burned and unburned areas were analyzed. The LR and NN techniques were applied to two study sites with varied topography. We evaluated the performance of both methods in predicting burned scars based on predictive accuracy, uncertainty index, and computation time. The experimental results indicate that (1) the LR is more efficient than the NN in predicting burned scars, but both techniques can produce similar and acceptable prediction accuracy (overall average accuracy greater than 97 percent for both methods at the two study sites) of p/a of burned areas; (2) among all six original TM bands and five vegetation indices, original TM4 and TM7 and NDVI1 (TM4, TM7) and NDV12 (TM4, TM3) exhibit the highest discrimination between burned scars and unburned vegetation areas; and (3) the predictive accuracy produced with samples from the shaded and shadowed areas is lower than that from the sunlit areas.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPhotogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing-
dc.titleDetermination of burnt scars using logistic regression and neural network techniques from a single post-fire Landsat 7 ETM+ image-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.14358/PERS.70.7.841-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-4143109067-
dc.identifier.volume70-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage841-
dc.identifier.epage850-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000222346700009-
dc.identifier.issnl0099-1112-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats