File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/2309499020988176
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85101033409
- PMID: 33569998
- WOS: WOS:000618763000001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Personal protective equipment usage, recycling and disposal among spine surgeons: An Asia Pacific Spine Society survey
Title | Personal protective equipment usage, recycling and disposal among spine surgeons: An Asia Pacific Spine Society survey |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Asia Pacific Spine Society clinic COVID-19 operation theatre personal protection equipment |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications: Creative Commons. The Journal's web site is located at https://journals.sagepub.com/home/osj |
Citation | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2021, Epub 2021-02-11, v. 29 n. 1 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose:
In this study we investigated on the personal protective equipment (PPE) usage, recycling, and disposal among spine surgeons in the Asia Pacific region.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was carried out among spine surgeons in Asia Pacific. The questionnaires were focused on the usage, recycling and disposal of PPE.
Results:
Two hundred and twenty-two surgeons from 19 countries participated in the survey. When we sub-analysed the differences between countries, the provision of adequate PPE by hospitals ranged from 37.5% to 100%. The usage of PPE was generally high. The most used PPE were surgical face masks (88.7%), followed by surgical caps (88.3%), gowns (85.6%), sterile gloves (83.3%) and face shields (82.0%). The least used PPE were powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR) (23.0%) and shoes/boots (45.0%). The commonly used PPE for surgeries involving COVID-19 positive patients were N95 masks (74.8%), sterile gloves (73.0%), gowns (72.1%), surgical caps (71.6%), face shields (64.4%), goggles (64.0%), shoe covers (58.6%), plastic aprons (45.9%), shoes/boots (45.9%), surgical face masks (36.5%) and PAPRs (21.2%). Most PPE were not recycled. Biohazard bins were the preferred method of disposal for all types of PPE items compared to general waste.
Conclusions:
The usage of PPE was generally high among most countries especially for surgeries involving COVID-19 positive patients except for Myanmar and Nepal. Overall, the most used PPE were surgical face masks. For surgeries involving COVID-19 positive patients, the most used PPE were N95 masks. Most PPE were not recycled. Biohazard bins were the preferred method of disposal for all types of PPE. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/297162 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.557 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chiu, CK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, CYW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, JPY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, PWH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gani, SMA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwan, MK | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-08T07:15:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-08T07:15:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2021, Epub 2021-02-11, v. 29 n. 1 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1022-5536 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/297162 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: In this study we investigated on the personal protective equipment (PPE) usage, recycling, and disposal among spine surgeons in the Asia Pacific region. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among spine surgeons in Asia Pacific. The questionnaires were focused on the usage, recycling and disposal of PPE. Results: Two hundred and twenty-two surgeons from 19 countries participated in the survey. When we sub-analysed the differences between countries, the provision of adequate PPE by hospitals ranged from 37.5% to 100%. The usage of PPE was generally high. The most used PPE were surgical face masks (88.7%), followed by surgical caps (88.3%), gowns (85.6%), sterile gloves (83.3%) and face shields (82.0%). The least used PPE were powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR) (23.0%) and shoes/boots (45.0%). The commonly used PPE for surgeries involving COVID-19 positive patients were N95 masks (74.8%), sterile gloves (73.0%), gowns (72.1%), surgical caps (71.6%), face shields (64.4%), goggles (64.0%), shoe covers (58.6%), plastic aprons (45.9%), shoes/boots (45.9%), surgical face masks (36.5%) and PAPRs (21.2%). Most PPE were not recycled. Biohazard bins were the preferred method of disposal for all types of PPE items compared to general waste. Conclusions: The usage of PPE was generally high among most countries especially for surgeries involving COVID-19 positive patients except for Myanmar and Nepal. Overall, the most used PPE were surgical face masks. For surgeries involving COVID-19 positive patients, the most used PPE were N95 masks. Most PPE were not recycled. Biohazard bins were the preferred method of disposal for all types of PPE. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications: Creative Commons. The Journal's web site is located at https://journals.sagepub.com/home/osj | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Asia Pacific Spine Society | - |
dc.subject | clinic | - |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | - |
dc.subject | operation theatre | - |
dc.subject | personal protection equipment | - |
dc.title | Personal protective equipment usage, recycling and disposal among spine surgeons: An Asia Pacific Spine Society survey | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, JPY: cheungjp@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, PWH: gnuehcp6@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, JPY=rp01685 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/2309499020988176 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33569998 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85101033409 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 321596 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | Epub 2021-02-11, v. 29 n. 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 230949902098817 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 230949902098817 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000618763000001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |