File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation

TitleDentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation
Authors
KeywordsConfocal
CHX gel
dentinal tubule penetration
Er
Cr: YSGG laser
Issue Date2020
PublisherKare Publishing. The Journal's web site is located at http://eurendodj.com/
Citation
European Endodontic Journal, 2020, v. 5 n. 3, p. 264-270 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To investigate the influence of sonic agitation or laser-activated irrigation techniques on the removal chlorhexidine (CHX) and modified triple antibiotic paste (mTAP) on the sealer penetration depth and dislocation resistance of Guttaflow Bioseal. Methods: Single-rooted mandibular premolars (n=96) were prepared with rotary nickel titanium instruments and randomly divided into two groups (n=48) based on the intracanal medicaments used: Group 1, mTAP; Group 2, CHX gel. After 7 days, the specimens in each group were divided into three subgroups (n=16) based on the supplementary irrigation technique used to remove the medicaments: laser activated irrigation (Er, Cr: YSGG laser, Waterlase MD, Biolase Technology Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA), sonic agitation (EndoActivator, Dentslpy Sirona Endodontics, PA, USA) and syringe-and-needle irrigation (control) techniques. Canals were filled with single matched-taper gutta-percha cone and a calcium silicate-based sealer (GuttaFlow® Bioseal, Coltène/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany). At the end of three weeks, sealer penetration was investigated using confocal microscopy (n=6), and dislocation resistance was calculated by measuring the push-out bond strength (n=10). Statistical analysis was performed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc test (P=0.05). Results: Laser activated irrigation resulted in significantly higher depth of sealer penetration compared to sonic agitation and syringe irrigation (P<0.01). The average sealer penetration depths were recorded as 846.6 µm, 786.5 µm and 505 µm in the Er,Cr: YSGG laser, EndoActivator and control groups, respectively. The mean bond strength obtained in group 3 (syringe-and-needle irrigation) was significantly less than the other groups (P<0.05). The mean values were 9.08 in the Er,Cr: YSGG laser group, 8.44 in the EndoActivator group and 5.08 in the needle group. Conclusion: Er,Cr;YSGG laser irrigation to remove the medicaments was advantageous to other irrigation techniques in sealer penetration and dislocation resistance of the sealer. (EEJ-2020-04-081)
Descriptioneid_2-s2.0-85101690479
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/297629
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.566
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÖzlek, E-
dc.contributor.authorNeelakantan, P-
dc.contributor.authorAkkol, E-
dc.contributor.authorGündüz, H-
dc.contributor.authorUçar, AY-
dc.contributor.authorBelli, S-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T04:19:37Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-23T04:19:37Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Endodontic Journal, 2020, v. 5 n. 3, p. 264-270-
dc.identifier.issn2548-0839-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/297629-
dc.descriptioneid_2-s2.0-85101690479-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the influence of sonic agitation or laser-activated irrigation techniques on the removal chlorhexidine (CHX) and modified triple antibiotic paste (mTAP) on the sealer penetration depth and dislocation resistance of Guttaflow Bioseal. Methods: Single-rooted mandibular premolars (n=96) were prepared with rotary nickel titanium instruments and randomly divided into two groups (n=48) based on the intracanal medicaments used: Group 1, mTAP; Group 2, CHX gel. After 7 days, the specimens in each group were divided into three subgroups (n=16) based on the supplementary irrigation technique used to remove the medicaments: laser activated irrigation (Er, Cr: YSGG laser, Waterlase MD, Biolase Technology Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA), sonic agitation (EndoActivator, Dentslpy Sirona Endodontics, PA, USA) and syringe-and-needle irrigation (control) techniques. Canals were filled with single matched-taper gutta-percha cone and a calcium silicate-based sealer (GuttaFlow® Bioseal, Coltène/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany). At the end of three weeks, sealer penetration was investigated using confocal microscopy (n=6), and dislocation resistance was calculated by measuring the push-out bond strength (n=10). Statistical analysis was performed using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc test (P=0.05). Results: Laser activated irrigation resulted in significantly higher depth of sealer penetration compared to sonic agitation and syringe irrigation (P<0.01). The average sealer penetration depths were recorded as 846.6 µm, 786.5 µm and 505 µm in the Er,Cr: YSGG laser, EndoActivator and control groups, respectively. The mean bond strength obtained in group 3 (syringe-and-needle irrigation) was significantly less than the other groups (P<0.05). The mean values were 9.08 in the Er,Cr: YSGG laser group, 8.44 in the EndoActivator group and 5.08 in the needle group. Conclusion: Er,Cr;YSGG laser irrigation to remove the medicaments was advantageous to other irrigation techniques in sealer penetration and dislocation resistance of the sealer. (EEJ-2020-04-081)-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherKare Publishing. The Journal's web site is located at http://eurendodj.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Endodontic Journal-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectConfocal-
dc.subjectCHX gel-
dc.subjectdentinal tubule penetration-
dc.subjectEr-
dc.subjectCr: YSGG laser-
dc.titleDentinal Tubule Penetration and Dislocation Resistance of a New Bioactive Root Canal Sealer Following Root Canal Medicament Removal Using Sonic Agitation or Laser-Activated Irrigation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailNeelakantan, P: prasanna@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityNeelakantan, P=rp02214-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/eej.2020.92905-
dc.identifier.pmid33353924-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7881371-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85101690479-
dc.identifier.hkuros321776-
dc.identifier.volume5-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage264-
dc.identifier.epage270-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000600195800015-
dc.publisher.placeIstanbul, Turkey-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats