File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1558/isla.17846
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85124284480
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparing whole-class discussion and task-based activity: a small-scale study
Title | Comparing whole-class discussion and task-based activity: a small-scale study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | communication interaction negotiation of meaning task-based activity whole-class discussion |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | Equinox Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at www.equinoxpub.com/ISLA |
Citation | Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 2021, v. 5 n. 1, p. 1-36 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This study examined the participation patterns and effectiveness of two different instructional treatments: Treatment One consisted of a task-based activity; Treatment Two used a whole-class discussion approach (Q/A paradigm). The research investigated which instructional treatment was more relevant and effective. The quantity of information learners could remember immediately after instruction, one week later, and the information that emerged through the interactional formats were measured. Each treatment was carried out for approximately one hour and then participants were asked to write a summary. After a week, students were given a piece of paper to summarise what was carried out the week before to see how much information they could remember. All the interactions were transcribed. L2 learners’ response towards the task based activity showed positive results and the task-based activity treatment was considered a better pedagogical approach. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/299335 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.197 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Farzaneh, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Benati, A | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-10T07:00:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-10T07:00:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 2021, v. 5 n. 1, p. 1-36 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2398-4155 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/299335 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study examined the participation patterns and effectiveness of two different instructional treatments: Treatment One consisted of a task-based activity; Treatment Two used a whole-class discussion approach (Q/A paradigm). The research investigated which instructional treatment was more relevant and effective. The quantity of information learners could remember immediately after instruction, one week later, and the information that emerged through the interactional formats were measured. Each treatment was carried out for approximately one hour and then participants were asked to write a summary. After a week, students were given a piece of paper to summarise what was carried out the week before to see how much information they could remember. All the interactions were transcribed. L2 learners’ response towards the task based activity showed positive results and the task-based activity treatment was considered a better pedagogical approach. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Equinox Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at www.equinoxpub.com/ISLA | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Instructed Second Language Acquisition | - |
dc.subject | communication | - |
dc.subject | interaction | - |
dc.subject | negotiation of meaning | - |
dc.subject | task-based activity | - |
dc.subject | whole-class discussion | - |
dc.title | Comparing whole-class discussion and task-based activity: a small-scale study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Benati, A: abenati@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Benati, A=rp02739 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1558/isla.17846 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85124284480 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 322384 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 322282 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 5 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 36 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |