File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: E-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case

TitleE-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case
Authors
KeywordsPublic transit
Stated preference
Travel demand analysis
Modal shift
E-scooter sharing
Mixed logit models
Issue Date2021
Citation
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, v. 147, p. 177-196 How to Cite?
AbstractE-scooter sharing provides a last-mile solution to complement transit services, but less was known about its effectiveness in serving short-distance transit trips. We investigate the potential of using e-scooter sharing to replace short-distance transit trips of excessive indirectness, multiple transfers, and long access-egress walking. First, we conducted a stated preference survey on e-scooter users in the Central Area of Singapore and estimated mixed logit models to examine factors influencing the choice of e-scooters and transit. We then calculated the number of transit trips that can be replaced by e-scooters. Second, we analyzed the decision of e-scooter companies in terms of the trade-offs between serving more e-scooter trips and making more revenue under varying fares. The results show that fare, MRT transfer, and MRT access-egress walking distance have significantly negative impacts on mode utilities with random tastes among respondents. Male, young and high-income groups are more heterogeneous in e-scooter preferences compared with other groups. The loss of mode share can be nearly 17% if maximizing the revenue. We classify trade-off situations into five categories and provide suggestions of how to balance between mode share and revenue for each category. Several implications are drawn for better harnessing and regulating this new mobility service, including where to deploy e-scooters to satisfy the demand unmet by the transit and how to reach a proper balance between private operators and public welfare.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300143
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.182
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCao, Zhejing-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaohu-
dc.contributor.authorChua, Kelman-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Honghai-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Jinhua-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T05:49:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T05:49:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, v. 147, p. 177-196-
dc.identifier.issn0965-8564-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300143-
dc.description.abstractE-scooter sharing provides a last-mile solution to complement transit services, but less was known about its effectiveness in serving short-distance transit trips. We investigate the potential of using e-scooter sharing to replace short-distance transit trips of excessive indirectness, multiple transfers, and long access-egress walking. First, we conducted a stated preference survey on e-scooter users in the Central Area of Singapore and estimated mixed logit models to examine factors influencing the choice of e-scooters and transit. We then calculated the number of transit trips that can be replaced by e-scooters. Second, we analyzed the decision of e-scooter companies in terms of the trade-offs between serving more e-scooter trips and making more revenue under varying fares. The results show that fare, MRT transfer, and MRT access-egress walking distance have significantly negative impacts on mode utilities with random tastes among respondents. Male, young and high-income groups are more heterogeneous in e-scooter preferences compared with other groups. The loss of mode share can be nearly 17% if maximizing the revenue. We classify trade-off situations into five categories and provide suggestions of how to balance between mode share and revenue for each category. Several implications are drawn for better harnessing and regulating this new mobility service, including where to deploy e-scooters to satisfy the demand unmet by the transit and how to reach a proper balance between private operators and public welfare.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice-
dc.subjectPublic transit-
dc.subjectStated preference-
dc.subjectTravel demand analysis-
dc.subjectModal shift-
dc.subjectE-scooter sharing-
dc.subjectMixed logit models-
dc.titleE-scooter sharing to serve short-distance transit trips: A Singapore case-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.004-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85102858820-
dc.identifier.hkuros326206-
dc.identifier.volume147-
dc.identifier.spage177-
dc.identifier.epage196-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000640647900011-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats