File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Rights adjudication and constitutional pluralism in Germany and Europe

TitleRights adjudication and constitutional pluralism in Germany and Europe
Authors
KeywordsEuropean Court of Justice
labour law
non-discrimination
Constitutional pluralism
Europeanization
legal integration
Issue Date2012
Citation
Journal of European Public Policy, 2012, v. 19, n. 1, p. 92-108 How to Cite?
AbstractThe development of a corpus of fundamental rights at the EU level has accentuated the constitutional pluralism that existed within many national legal systems. Illustrating the dynamic, the adjudication of the age discrimination provisions of the 2000 Framework Directive on Employment Equality in Germany produced two major outcomes. First, interactions between the ECJ and the German labour courts served to upgrade rights protections afforded to workers, relative to national constitutional standards. Second, the structural position of the German Federal Constitutional Court, as a privileged locus of rights protection, was weakened, while the authority of the labour courts was enhanced. Looking ahead, we are entering a new era of rights-based legal integration that will further serve to Europeanize national law, while undermining the (supposed) unity and coherence of national legal orders. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300168
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.366
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.557
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStone Sweet, Alec-
dc.contributor.authorStranz, Kathleen-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T05:49:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T05:49:11Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European Public Policy, 2012, v. 19, n. 1, p. 92-108-
dc.identifier.issn1350-1763-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300168-
dc.description.abstractThe development of a corpus of fundamental rights at the EU level has accentuated the constitutional pluralism that existed within many national legal systems. Illustrating the dynamic, the adjudication of the age discrimination provisions of the 2000 Framework Directive on Employment Equality in Germany produced two major outcomes. First, interactions between the ECJ and the German labour courts served to upgrade rights protections afforded to workers, relative to national constitutional standards. Second, the structural position of the German Federal Constitutional Court, as a privileged locus of rights protection, was weakened, while the authority of the labour courts was enhanced. Looking ahead, we are entering a new era of rights-based legal integration that will further serve to Europeanize national law, while undermining the (supposed) unity and coherence of national legal orders. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of European Public Policy-
dc.subjectEuropean Court of Justice-
dc.subjectlabour law-
dc.subjectnon-discrimination-
dc.subjectConstitutional pluralism-
dc.subjectEuropeanization-
dc.subjectlegal integration-
dc.titleRights adjudication and constitutional pluralism in Germany and Europe-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13501763.2012.632148-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84855453825-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage92-
dc.identifier.epage108-
dc.identifier.eissn1466-4429-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000302092300007-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats