File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.4324/9780203005989-2
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84905960511
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions
Title | Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2003 |
Publisher | Frank Cass. |
Citation | Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. In Thatcher, M, Stone Sweet, A (Eds.). The Politics of Delegation, p. 1-22. London: Frank Cass, 2003 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The chapter summarises the analytical frameworks, questions, and empirical findings of the volume. It defines the key concepts used. It then sets out the principal-agent framework that explains delegation to NMIs through functional logics for principals. It sets out alternative explanations based on sociological and historical institutionalism. Thereafter, it relates the empirical findings of the volume to these wider debates about delegation. It argues that although functional demands for delegation can almost always be identified, purely functional accounts of delegation to NMIs are inadequate. Explaining the decision to delegate and the institutional forms of that delegation involves including and specifying interests, policy learning/institutional isomorphism and institutional inheritances. Delegation has also had major consequences on the distribution of power, policy making processes and substantive policy choices, both through its direct effects, and via feedback effects. Finally, delegation has raised questions about the legitimacy and accountability of NMIs. © 2003 Frank Cass & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/300177 |
ISBN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Thatcher, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Stone Sweet, A | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-04T05:49:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-04T05:49:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. In Thatcher, M, Stone Sweet, A (Eds.). The Politics of Delegation, p. 1-22. London: Frank Cass, 2003 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9780714655611 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/300177 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The chapter summarises the analytical frameworks, questions, and empirical findings of the volume. It defines the key concepts used. It then sets out the principal-agent framework that explains delegation to NMIs through functional logics for principals. It sets out alternative explanations based on sociological and historical institutionalism. Thereafter, it relates the empirical findings of the volume to these wider debates about delegation. It argues that although functional demands for delegation can almost always be identified, purely functional accounts of delegation to NMIs are inadequate. Explaining the decision to delegate and the institutional forms of that delegation involves including and specifying interests, policy learning/institutional isomorphism and institutional inheritances. Delegation has also had major consequences on the distribution of power, policy making processes and substantive policy choices, both through its direct effects, and via feedback effects. Finally, delegation has raised questions about the legitimacy and accountability of NMIs. © 2003 Frank Cass & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Frank Cass. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Politics of Delegation | - |
dc.title | Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions | - |
dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9780203005989-2 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84905960511 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 22 | - |
dc.publisher.place | London | - |