File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Constitutional Courts

TitleConstitutional Courts
Authors
KeywordsLegitimacy
Separation of power
Constitutional court
Issue Date2012
PublisherOxford University Press.
Citation
Constitutional Courts. In Rosenfeld, M, Sajó, A (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, p. 816-830. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article provides an introduction to the basic institutional features of constitutional courts (CCs), as well as an overview of the small but growing comparative literature on their design, function, impact, and legitimacy. It presents the CC as an ideal type, with its own functional logics, and surveys the comparative scholarship seeking to explain commonalities and differences across systems. It emphasizes inter-disciplinarity, in part, because political scientists have been at the forefront of empirical research and, in part, because powerful CCs have shaped and reshaped their own political environments. Successful CCs routinely subvert separation of powers schemes, including elements on which their legitimacy was originally founded. In consequence, new legitimacy questions and discourses have emerged.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300186
ISBN
Series/Report no.Oxford Handbooks

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStone Sweet, Alec-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-04T05:49:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-04T05:49:14Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationConstitutional Courts. In Rosenfeld, M, Sajó, A (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, p. 816-830. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012-
dc.identifier.isbn9780199578610-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/300186-
dc.description.abstractThis article provides an introduction to the basic institutional features of constitutional courts (CCs), as well as an overview of the small but growing comparative literature on their design, function, impact, and legitimacy. It presents the CC as an ideal type, with its own functional logics, and surveys the comparative scholarship seeking to explain commonalities and differences across systems. It emphasizes inter-disciplinarity, in part, because political scientists have been at the forefront of empirical research and, in part, because powerful CCs have shaped and reshaped their own political environments. Successful CCs routinely subvert separation of powers schemes, including elements on which their legitimacy was originally founded. In consequence, new legitimacy questions and discourses have emerged.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press.-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOxford Handbooks-
dc.subjectLegitimacy-
dc.subjectSeparation of power-
dc.subjectConstitutional court-
dc.titleConstitutional Courts-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.013.0040-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84924957537-
dc.identifier.spage816-
dc.identifier.epage830-
dc.publisher.placeOxford, UK-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats