File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: China’s Law and Development: A Case Study of the China International Commercial Court

TitleChina’s Law and Development: A Case Study of the China International Commercial Court
Authors
KeywordsChina International Commercial Court
Legal infrastructure
Capacity building
Paradigm shift
Beijing Consensus
Law and Development
China
Issue Date2021
PublisherHarvard University, Law School. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.harvardilj.org
Citation
Harvard International Law Journal, 2021, v. 62 n. special issue, p. 67-104 How to Cite?
AbstractEstablished in 2018, the China International Commercial Court (CICC) represents a major step of China’s top-down effort in its capacity building in terms of its national dispute resolution infrastructure, judicial personnel, as well as the ambition to create a Belt and Road lex mercatoria and legal harmonization. Through a close examination of the legal framework of the CICC, the paper argues that the establishment of the CICC has showcased a shift in the paradigm in the Beijing Consensus in the context of law and development via a more active top-down, institutional and hard-law approach. The article argues that the shift in paradigm does not mean that China is necessarily moving away from or abandoning the norm-based soft-law approach. Instead, it is likely that both Yin (soft power) and Yang (hard power) of China’s law and development will be a complementary attempt in its overriding “Rule of Law China” (fazhi zhongguo) vision. It is further argued that the establishment of the CICC will represent a reshaping and readjustment of the Beijing Consensus amidst the tension between Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative and Washington’s IndoPacific Strategy, signifying a more determined and proactive mindset in the ideological tug of war in the realm of legal architecture and the international rule of law discourse.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301164
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 1.650
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.201
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGu, W-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-27T08:07:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-27T08:07:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationHarvard International Law Journal, 2021, v. 62 n. special issue, p. 67-104-
dc.identifier.issn0017-8063-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301164-
dc.description.abstractEstablished in 2018, the China International Commercial Court (CICC) represents a major step of China’s top-down effort in its capacity building in terms of its national dispute resolution infrastructure, judicial personnel, as well as the ambition to create a Belt and Road lex mercatoria and legal harmonization. Through a close examination of the legal framework of the CICC, the paper argues that the establishment of the CICC has showcased a shift in the paradigm in the Beijing Consensus in the context of law and development via a more active top-down, institutional and hard-law approach. The article argues that the shift in paradigm does not mean that China is necessarily moving away from or abandoning the norm-based soft-law approach. Instead, it is likely that both Yin (soft power) and Yang (hard power) of China’s law and development will be a complementary attempt in its overriding “Rule of Law China” (fazhi zhongguo) vision. It is further argued that the establishment of the CICC will represent a reshaping and readjustment of the Beijing Consensus amidst the tension between Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative and Washington’s IndoPacific Strategy, signifying a more determined and proactive mindset in the ideological tug of war in the realm of legal architecture and the international rule of law discourse.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHarvard University, Law School. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.harvardilj.org-
dc.relation.ispartofHarvard International Law Journal-
dc.subjectChina International Commercial Court-
dc.subjectLegal infrastructure-
dc.subjectCapacity building-
dc.subjectParadigm shift-
dc.subjectBeijing Consensus-
dc.subjectLaw and Development-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.titleChina’s Law and Development: A Case Study of the China International Commercial Court-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailGu, W: guweixia@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityGu, W=rp01249-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros323381-
dc.identifier.volume62-
dc.identifier.issuespecial issue-
dc.identifier.spage67-
dc.identifier.epage104-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.ssrn3830253-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2021/014-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats