File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Watering down environmental regulation in China

TitleWatering down environmental regulation in China
Authors
Issue Date2020
Citation
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2020, v. 135, n. 4, p. 2135-2185 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article estimates the effect of environmental regulation on firm productivity using a spatial regression discontinuity design implicit in China’s water quality monitoring system. Because water quality readings are important for political evaluations and the monitoring stations only capture emissions from their upstream regions, local government officials are incentivized to enforce tighter environmental standards on firms immediately upstream of a monitoring station, rather than those immediately downstream. Exploiting this discontinuity in regulation stringency with novel firm-level geocoded emission and production data sets, we find that immediate upstream polluters face a more than 24% reduction in total factor productivity (TFP), and a more than 57% reduction in chemical oxygen demand emissions, as compared with their immediate downstream counterparts. We find that the discontinuity in TFP does not exist in nonpolluting industries, only emerged after the government explicitly linked political promotion to water quality readings, and was predominantly driven by prefectural cities with career-driven leaders. Linking the TFP estimate with the emission estimate, a back-of-the-envelope calculation indicates that China’s water regulation efforts between 2000 and 2007 were associated with an economic cost of more than 800 billion Chinese yuan.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/302276
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 11.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 30.448
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, Guojun-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shaoda-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Bing-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T13:58:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-30T13:58:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationQuarterly Journal of Economics, 2020, v. 135, n. 4, p. 2135-2185-
dc.identifier.issn0033-5533-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/302276-
dc.description.abstractThis article estimates the effect of environmental regulation on firm productivity using a spatial regression discontinuity design implicit in China’s water quality monitoring system. Because water quality readings are important for political evaluations and the monitoring stations only capture emissions from their upstream regions, local government officials are incentivized to enforce tighter environmental standards on firms immediately upstream of a monitoring station, rather than those immediately downstream. Exploiting this discontinuity in regulation stringency with novel firm-level geocoded emission and production data sets, we find that immediate upstream polluters face a more than 24% reduction in total factor productivity (TFP), and a more than 57% reduction in chemical oxygen demand emissions, as compared with their immediate downstream counterparts. We find that the discontinuity in TFP does not exist in nonpolluting industries, only emerged after the government explicitly linked political promotion to water quality readings, and was predominantly driven by prefectural cities with career-driven leaders. Linking the TFP estimate with the emission estimate, a back-of-the-envelope calculation indicates that China’s water regulation efforts between 2000 and 2007 were associated with an economic cost of more than 800 billion Chinese yuan.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofQuarterly Journal of Economics-
dc.titleWatering down environmental regulation in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/qje/qjaa024-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85094634817-
dc.identifier.volume135-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage2135-
dc.identifier.epage2185-
dc.identifier.eissn1531-4650-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000593217300007-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats