File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Toward the development of a comprehensive clinically oriented patient profile: a systematic review of the purpose, characteristic, and methodological quality of classification systems of adult spinal deformity.

TitleToward the development of a comprehensive clinically oriented patient profile: a systematic review of the purpose, characteristic, and methodological quality of classification systems of adult spinal deformity.
Authors
Editors
Editor(s):Oyesiku, NM
Issue Date2021
PublisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery
Citation
Neurosurgery , 2021, v. 88 n. 6, p. 1065-1073. How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND Existing adult spinal deformity (ASD) classification systems are based on radiological parameters but management of ASD patients requires a holistic approach. A comprehensive clinically oriented patient profile and classification of ASD that can guide decision-making and correlate with patient outcomes is lacking. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review to determine the purpose, characteristic, and methodological quality of classification systems currently used in ASD. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science for literature published between January 2000 and October 2018. From the included studies, list of classification systems, their methodological measurement properties, and correlation with treatment outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Out of 4470 screened references, 163 were included, and 54 different classification systems for ASD were identified. The most commonly used was the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification system. A total of 35 classifications were based on radiological parameters, and no correlation was found between any classification system levels with patient-related outcomes. Limited evidence of limited quality was available on methodological quality of the classification systems. For studies that reported the data, intraobserver and interobserver reliability were good (kappa = 0.8). CONCLUSION This systematic literature search revealed that current classification systems in clinical use neither include a comprehensive set of dimensions relevant to decision-making nor did they correlate with outcomes. A classification system comprising a core set of patient-related, radiological, and etiological characteristics relevant to the management of ASD is needed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/302385
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.313
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwan, KYH-
dc.contributor.authorNaresh-Babu, J-
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, W-
dc.contributor.authorde Kleuver, M-
dc.contributor.authorPolly, DW-
dc.contributor.authorYilgor, C-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Y-
dc.contributor.authorPark, JB-
dc.contributor.authorIto, M-
dc.contributor.authorvan Hooff, ML-
dc.contributor.editorOyesiku, NM-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-06T03:31:32Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-06T03:31:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationNeurosurgery , 2021, v. 88 n. 6, p. 1065-1073.-
dc.identifier.issn0148-396X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/302385-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Existing adult spinal deformity (ASD) classification systems are based on radiological parameters but management of ASD patients requires a holistic approach. A comprehensive clinically oriented patient profile and classification of ASD that can guide decision-making and correlate with patient outcomes is lacking. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review to determine the purpose, characteristic, and methodological quality of classification systems currently used in ASD. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science for literature published between January 2000 and October 2018. From the included studies, list of classification systems, their methodological measurement properties, and correlation with treatment outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Out of 4470 screened references, 163 were included, and 54 different classification systems for ASD were identified. The most commonly used was the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification system. A total of 35 classifications were based on radiological parameters, and no correlation was found between any classification system levels with patient-related outcomes. Limited evidence of limited quality was available on methodological quality of the classification systems. For studies that reported the data, intraobserver and interobserver reliability were good (kappa = 0.8). CONCLUSION This systematic literature search revealed that current classification systems in clinical use neither include a comprehensive set of dimensions relevant to decision-making nor did they correlate with outcomes. A classification system comprising a core set of patient-related, radiological, and etiological characteristics relevant to the management of ASD is needed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery-
dc.relation.ispartofNeurosurgery-
dc.titleToward the development of a comprehensive clinically oriented patient profile: a systematic review of the purpose, characteristic, and methodological quality of classification systems of adult spinal deformity.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailKwan, KYH: kyhkwan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKwan, KYH=rp02014-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/neuros/nyab023-
dc.identifier.hkuros324726-
dc.identifier.volume88-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1065-
dc.identifier.epage1073.-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000661532300033-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats