File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Simulation and theory of abnormal grain growth-anisotropic grain boundary energies and mobilities

TitleSimulation and theory of abnormal grain growth-anisotropic grain boundary energies and mobilities
Authors
Issue Date1989
Citation
Acta Metallurgica, 1989, v. 37, n. 4, p. 1227-1240 How to Cite?
AbstractAbnormal grain growth has been studied by means of a computer-based Monte Carlo model. This model has previously been shown to reproduce many of the essential features of normal grain growth. The simulations presented in this work are based on a modified model in which two distinct types of grains are present. These two grain types might correspond to two components of different crystallographic orientation, for example. This results in three classes of grain boundaries: 1. (a) between unlike types, 2. (b)between grains of the first type and 3. (c) between grains of the second type, to which different grain boundary energies or different mobilities can be assigned. Most simulations started with a single grain of the first type embedded in a matrix of grains of the second type. Anisotropie grain boundary energies were modeled by assigning a higher energy to boundaries between like type than to boundaries between grains of unlike type. For this case, abnormal grain growth only occurred for an energy ratio greater than 2 and then wetting of the matrix by the abnormal grain occurred. Anisotropie grain boundary mobilities were modeled by assigning a lower mobility to boundaries between grains of like type than to boundaries between unlike type. For this case the extent of abnormal grain growth varied with the ratio of mobilities and it is tentatively concluded that there is a limiting ratio of size of the abnormal grain relative to the matrix. A simple treatment of anisotropic grain boundary mobility was developed by modifying Hillert's grain growth model [Acta metall. 13, 227 (1965)]. This theoretical treatment also produced a limiting ratio of relative size that is a simple function of the mobility ratio. © 1989.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/303094
ISSN
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRollett, A. D.-
dc.contributor.authorSrolovitz, D. J.-
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, M. P.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-15T08:24:36Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-15T08:24:36Z-
dc.date.issued1989-
dc.identifier.citationActa Metallurgica, 1989, v. 37, n. 4, p. 1227-1240-
dc.identifier.issn0001-6160-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/303094-
dc.description.abstractAbnormal grain growth has been studied by means of a computer-based Monte Carlo model. This model has previously been shown to reproduce many of the essential features of normal grain growth. The simulations presented in this work are based on a modified model in which two distinct types of grains are present. These two grain types might correspond to two components of different crystallographic orientation, for example. This results in three classes of grain boundaries: 1. (a) between unlike types, 2. (b)between grains of the first type and 3. (c) between grains of the second type, to which different grain boundary energies or different mobilities can be assigned. Most simulations started with a single grain of the first type embedded in a matrix of grains of the second type. Anisotropie grain boundary energies were modeled by assigning a higher energy to boundaries between like type than to boundaries between grains of unlike type. For this case, abnormal grain growth only occurred for an energy ratio greater than 2 and then wetting of the matrix by the abnormal grain occurred. Anisotropie grain boundary mobilities were modeled by assigning a lower mobility to boundaries between grains of like type than to boundaries between unlike type. For this case the extent of abnormal grain growth varied with the ratio of mobilities and it is tentatively concluded that there is a limiting ratio of size of the abnormal grain relative to the matrix. A simple treatment of anisotropic grain boundary mobility was developed by modifying Hillert's grain growth model [Acta metall. 13, 227 (1965)]. This theoretical treatment also produced a limiting ratio of relative size that is a simple function of the mobility ratio. © 1989.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofActa Metallurgica-
dc.titleSimulation and theory of abnormal grain growth-anisotropic grain boundary energies and mobilities-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0001-6160(89)90117-X-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0024650272-
dc.identifier.volume37-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage1227-
dc.identifier.epage1240-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1989T614300022-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats