File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/papq.12089
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84940099707
- WOS: WOS:000383624600004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Reasons Wrong and Right
Title | Reasons Wrong and Right |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Citation | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2016, v. 97, n. 3, p. 371-399 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The fact that someone is generous is a reason to admire them. The fact that someone will pay you to admire them is also a reason to admire them. But there is a difference in kind between these two reasons: the former seems to be the ‘right’ kind of reason to admire, whereas the latter seems to be the ‘wrong’ kind of reason to admire. The Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem is the problem of explaining the difference between the ‘right’ and the ‘wrong’ kind of reasons wherever it appears. In this article I argue that two recent proposals for solving the Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem do not work. I then offer an alternative solution that provides a unified, systematic explanation of the difference between the two kinds of reasons. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/303454 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.769 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sharadin, Nathaniel | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-15T08:25:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-15T08:25:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2016, v. 97, n. 3, p. 371-399 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0279-0750 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/303454 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The fact that someone is generous is a reason to admire them. The fact that someone will pay you to admire them is also a reason to admire them. But there is a difference in kind between these two reasons: the former seems to be the ‘right’ kind of reason to admire, whereas the latter seems to be the ‘wrong’ kind of reason to admire. The Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem is the problem of explaining the difference between the ‘right’ and the ‘wrong’ kind of reasons wherever it appears. In this article I argue that two recent proposals for solving the Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem do not work. I then offer an alternative solution that provides a unified, systematic explanation of the difference between the two kinds of reasons. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Pacific Philosophical Quarterly | - |
dc.title | Reasons Wrong and Right | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/papq.12089 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84940099707 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 97 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 371 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 399 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000383624600004 | - |