File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Narrative review on health-edrm primary prevention measures for vector-borne diseases

TitleNarrative review on health-edrm primary prevention measures for vector-borne diseases
Authors
Issue Date2020
Citation
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, v. 17, n. 16, article no. 5981 How to Cite?
AbstractClimate change is expanding the global at-risk population for vector-borne diseases (VBDs). The World Health Organization (WHO) health emergency and disaster risk management (health-EDRM) framework emphasises the importance of primary prevention of biological hazards and its value in protecting against VBDs. The framework encourages stakeholder coordination and information sharing, though there is still a need to reinforce prevention and recovery within disaster management. This keyword-search based narrative literature review searched databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Medline between January 2000 and May 2020, and identified 134 publications. In total, 10 health-EDRM primary prevention measures are summarised at three levels (personal, environmental and household). Enabling factor, limiting factors, co-benefits and strength of evidence were identified. Current studies on primary prevention measures for VBDs focus on health risk-reduction, with minimal evaluation of actual disease reduction. Although prevention against mosquito-borne diseases, notably malaria, has been well-studied, research on other vectors and VBDs remains limited. Other gaps included the limited evidence pertaining to prevention in resource-poor settings and the efficacy of alternatives, discrepancies amongst agencies’ recommendations, and limited studies on the impact of technological advancements and habitat change on VBD prevalence. Health-EDRM primary prevention measures for VBDs require high-priority research to facilitate multifaceted, multi-sectoral, coordinated responses that will enable effective risk mitigation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/303688
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 2.849
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.747
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Emily Ying Yang-
dc.contributor.authorSham, Tiffany Sze Tung-
dc.contributor.authorShahzada, Tayyab Salim-
dc.contributor.authorDubois, Caroline-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Zhe-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Sida-
dc.contributor.authorHung, Kevin K.C.-
dc.contributor.authorTse, Shelly L.A.-
dc.contributor.authorKwok, Kin On-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Pui Hong-
dc.contributor.authorKayano, Ryoma-
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Rajib-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-15T08:25:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-15T08:25:49Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, v. 17, n. 16, article no. 5981-
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/303688-
dc.description.abstractClimate change is expanding the global at-risk population for vector-borne diseases (VBDs). The World Health Organization (WHO) health emergency and disaster risk management (health-EDRM) framework emphasises the importance of primary prevention of biological hazards and its value in protecting against VBDs. The framework encourages stakeholder coordination and information sharing, though there is still a need to reinforce prevention and recovery within disaster management. This keyword-search based narrative literature review searched databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Medline between January 2000 and May 2020, and identified 134 publications. In total, 10 health-EDRM primary prevention measures are summarised at three levels (personal, environmental and household). Enabling factor, limiting factors, co-benefits and strength of evidence were identified. Current studies on primary prevention measures for VBDs focus on health risk-reduction, with minimal evaluation of actual disease reduction. Although prevention against mosquito-borne diseases, notably malaria, has been well-studied, research on other vectors and VBDs remains limited. Other gaps included the limited evidence pertaining to prevention in resource-poor settings and the efficacy of alternatives, discrepancies amongst agencies’ recommendations, and limited studies on the impact of technological advancements and habitat change on VBD prevalence. Health-EDRM primary prevention measures for VBDs require high-priority research to facilitate multifaceted, multi-sectoral, coordinated responses that will enable effective risk mitigation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleNarrative review on health-edrm primary prevention measures for vector-borne diseases-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph17165981-
dc.identifier.pmid32824754-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7459832-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85089521252-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.issue16-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 5981-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 5981-
dc.identifier.eissn1660-4601-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000565064200001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats