File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3005076
- WOS: WOS:000690441200022
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Active Ensemble Deep Learning for Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Classification
Title | Active Ensemble Deep Learning for Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Classification |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Active learning convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning ensemble learning image classification |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8859 |
Citation | IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2021, v. 18 n. 9, p. 1580-1584 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Although deep learning has achieved great success in the image-classification tasks, its performance is subject to the quantity and quality of the training samples. For the classification of the polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images, it is nearly impossible to annotate the images from visual interpretation. Therefore, it is urgent for remote-sensing scientists to develop new techniques for PolSAR image classification under the condition of very few training samples. In this letter, we take the advantage of active learning and propose active ensemble deep learning (AEDL) for PolSAR image classification. We first show that only 35% of the predicted labels of the deep-learning model’s snapshots near its convergence were exactly the same. The disagreement between the snapshots is nonnegligible. From the perspective of multiview learning, the snapshots together serve as a good committee to evaluate the importance of the unlabeled instances. Using the snapshot committee to give out the informativeness of the unlabeled data, the proposed AEDL achieved better performance on two real PolSAR images than the standard active learning strategies. It achieved the same classification accuracy with only 86% and 55% of the training samples compared to the breaking tie active learning and random selection for the Flevoland data set. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/304571 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.248 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Liu, SJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Luo, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shi, Q | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-23T09:01:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-23T09:01:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2021, v. 18 n. 9, p. 1580-1584 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1545-598X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/304571 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Although deep learning has achieved great success in the image-classification tasks, its performance is subject to the quantity and quality of the training samples. For the classification of the polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images, it is nearly impossible to annotate the images from visual interpretation. Therefore, it is urgent for remote-sensing scientists to develop new techniques for PolSAR image classification under the condition of very few training samples. In this letter, we take the advantage of active learning and propose active ensemble deep learning (AEDL) for PolSAR image classification. We first show that only 35% of the predicted labels of the deep-learning model’s snapshots near its convergence were exactly the same. The disagreement between the snapshots is nonnegligible. From the perspective of multiview learning, the snapshots together serve as a good committee to evaluate the importance of the unlabeled instances. Using the snapshot committee to give out the informativeness of the unlabeled data, the proposed AEDL achieved better performance on two real PolSAR images than the standard active learning strategies. It achieved the same classification accuracy with only 86% and 55% of the training samples compared to the breaking tie active learning and random selection for the Flevoland data set. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8859 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters | - |
dc.rights | IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters. Copyright © Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. | - |
dc.rights | ©20xx IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. | - |
dc.subject | Active learning | - |
dc.subject | convolutional neural network (CNN) | - |
dc.subject | deep learning | - |
dc.subject | ensemble learning | - |
dc.subject | image classification | - |
dc.title | Active Ensemble Deep Learning for Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Classification | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3005076 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 325236 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 18 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1580 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1584 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000690441200022 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |