File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Influence of material type, thickness and storage on fracture resistance of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers

TitleInfluence of material type, thickness and storage on fracture resistance of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers
Authors
KeywordsFracture resistance
Aging
Non-retentive occlusal veneers
Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic
Polymer-infiltrated ceramic
Issue Date2021
PublisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/17516161
Citation
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2021, v. 119, p. article no. 104485 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of restoration thickness, CAD/CAM material, and 6 months of artificial saliva storage on the fracture resistance of occlusal veneers. Materials and methods: A total of 84 intact maxillary molars were sectioned 4.0 mm occlusal to the cementoenamel junction to expose the dentine. The teeth were assigned into 3 main groups according to the type of restorative material (e.max CAD, Vita Enamic, and Lava Ultimate). In each group, the teeth were allocated into 2 subgroups (n = 14) according to restoration thickness (1.0 and 1.5 mm). The veneers were adhesively bonded using dual-cure self-adhesive luting agent. A total of 42 specimens comprising half the tested subgroups were stored in distilled water for 24-h before the test. The remaining half was stored in artificial saliva at 37 ± 1 °C in an incubator for 6 months. All specimens (n = 84) were subjected to 5000 thermal cycles between 5 and 55 °C ± 2 before the fracture resistance test. The maximum force at fracture was recorded in Newton. Failure mode was analyzed using a stereomicroscope. The results were analyzed using a parametric Three-way ANOVA test. Results: The results of the Three-way ANOVA test revealed that material type and restoration thickness significantly affected fracture resistance values (p < 0.5), while 6 months of storage in artificial saliva had no significant effect on mean fracture resistance values (p˃0.5). The most common failure patterns in CAD/CAM resin composite and polymer-infiltrated ceramics were scores I and score II. For glass ceramic groups, score IV and III were more dominant. Conclusions: All the tested CAD/CAM restorations in both thicknesses exhibited fracture resistance values exceeding normal and parafunctional bite forces. Polymer-infiltrated ceramics and CAD/CAM resin composite veneers showed more favorable fracture patterns.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304649
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.748
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlbelasy, E-
dc.contributor.authorHamama, HH-
dc.contributor.authorTsoi, JKH-
dc.contributor.authorMahmoud, SH-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T02:33:10Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-05T02:33:10Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2021, v. 119, p. article no. 104485-
dc.identifier.issn1751-6161-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304649-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of restoration thickness, CAD/CAM material, and 6 months of artificial saliva storage on the fracture resistance of occlusal veneers. Materials and methods: A total of 84 intact maxillary molars were sectioned 4.0 mm occlusal to the cementoenamel junction to expose the dentine. The teeth were assigned into 3 main groups according to the type of restorative material (e.max CAD, Vita Enamic, and Lava Ultimate). In each group, the teeth were allocated into 2 subgroups (n = 14) according to restoration thickness (1.0 and 1.5 mm). The veneers were adhesively bonded using dual-cure self-adhesive luting agent. A total of 42 specimens comprising half the tested subgroups were stored in distilled water for 24-h before the test. The remaining half was stored in artificial saliva at 37 ± 1 °C in an incubator for 6 months. All specimens (n = 84) were subjected to 5000 thermal cycles between 5 and 55 °C ± 2 before the fracture resistance test. The maximum force at fracture was recorded in Newton. Failure mode was analyzed using a stereomicroscope. The results were analyzed using a parametric Three-way ANOVA test. Results: The results of the Three-way ANOVA test revealed that material type and restoration thickness significantly affected fracture resistance values (p < 0.5), while 6 months of storage in artificial saliva had no significant effect on mean fracture resistance values (p˃0.5). The most common failure patterns in CAD/CAM resin composite and polymer-infiltrated ceramics were scores I and score II. For glass ceramic groups, score IV and III were more dominant. Conclusions: All the tested CAD/CAM restorations in both thicknesses exhibited fracture resistance values exceeding normal and parafunctional bite forces. Polymer-infiltrated ceramics and CAD/CAM resin composite veneers showed more favorable fracture patterns.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/17516161-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials-
dc.subjectFracture resistance-
dc.subjectAging-
dc.subjectNon-retentive occlusal veneers-
dc.subjectLithium disilicate glass-ceramic-
dc.subjectPolymer-infiltrated ceramic-
dc.titleInfluence of material type, thickness and storage on fracture resistance of CAD/CAM occlusal veneers-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailTsoi, JKH: jkhtsoi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTsoi, JKH=rp01609-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104485-
dc.identifier.pmid33812289-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85103629960-
dc.identifier.hkuros326566-
dc.identifier.volume119-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 104485-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 104485-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000652617800004-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats