File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

TitleInternational expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Authors
KeywordsConsensus
pancreaticoduodenectomy
laparoscopy
Delphi technique
Issue Date2020
PublisherAME Publishing Company. The Journal's web site is located at https://hbsn.amegroups.com/
Citation
Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition, 2020, v. 9 n. 4, p. 464-483 How to Cite?
AbstractImportance: While laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is being adopted with increasing enthusiasm worldwide, it is still challenging for both technical and anatomical reasons. Currently, there is no consensus on the technical standards for LPD. Objective: The aim of this consensus statement is to guide the continued safe progression and adoption of LPD. Evidence Review: An international panel of experts was selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Statements were produced upon reviewing the literature and assessed by the members of the expert panel. The literature search and its critical appraisal were limited to articles published in English during the period from 1994 to 2019. The Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials databases were searched, The search strategy included, but was not limited to, the terms ‘laparoscopic’, ‘pancreaticoduodenectomy, ‘pancreatoduodenectomy’, ‘Whipple’s operation’, and ‘minimally invasive surgery’. Reference lists from the included articles were manually checked for any additional studies, which were included when appropriate. Delphi method was used to establish expert consensus and the AGREE II-GRS Instrument was applied to assess the methodological quality and externally validate the final statements. The statements were further discussed during a one-day face-to-face meeting at the 1st Summit on Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery in Wuhan, China. Findings: Twenty-eight international experts from 8 countries constructed the expert panel. Sixteen statements were produced by the members of the expert panel. At least 80% of responders agreed with the majority (80%) of statements. Other than three randomized controlled trials published to date, most evidences were based on level 3 or 4 studies according to the AGREE II-GRS Instrument. Conclusions and Relevance: The Wuhan international expert consensus meeting on LPD has produced a set of clinical practice statements for the safe development and progression of LPD. LPD is currently in its development and exploration stages, as defined by the international IDEAL framework for surgical innovation. More robust randomized controlled trial and registry study are essential to proceed with the assessment of LPD.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304761
ISSN
2020 Impact Factor: 7.293
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQin, R-
dc.contributor.authorKendrick, ML-
dc.contributor.authorWolfgang, CL-
dc.contributor.authorEdil, BH-
dc.contributor.authorPalanivelu, C-
dc.contributor.authorParks, RW-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Y-
dc.contributor.authorHe, J-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, T-
dc.contributor.authorMou, Y-
dc.contributor.authorYu, X-
dc.contributor.authorPeng, B-
dc.contributor.authorSenthilnathan, P-
dc.contributor.authorHan, HS-
dc.contributor.authorLee, JH-
dc.contributor.authorUnno, M-
dc.contributor.authorDamink, SWMO-
dc.contributor.authorBansal, VK-
dc.contributor.authorChow, P-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, TT-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, N-
dc.contributor.authorTien, YW-
dc.contributor.authorWang, C-
dc.contributor.authorFok, M-
dc.contributor.authorCai, X-
dc.contributor.authorZou, S-
dc.contributor.authorPeng, S-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T02:34:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-05T02:34:48Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationHepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition, 2020, v. 9 n. 4, p. 464-483-
dc.identifier.issn2304-3881-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304761-
dc.description.abstractImportance: While laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is being adopted with increasing enthusiasm worldwide, it is still challenging for both technical and anatomical reasons. Currently, there is no consensus on the technical standards for LPD. Objective: The aim of this consensus statement is to guide the continued safe progression and adoption of LPD. Evidence Review: An international panel of experts was selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Statements were produced upon reviewing the literature and assessed by the members of the expert panel. The literature search and its critical appraisal were limited to articles published in English during the period from 1994 to 2019. The Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials databases were searched, The search strategy included, but was not limited to, the terms ‘laparoscopic’, ‘pancreaticoduodenectomy, ‘pancreatoduodenectomy’, ‘Whipple’s operation’, and ‘minimally invasive surgery’. Reference lists from the included articles were manually checked for any additional studies, which were included when appropriate. Delphi method was used to establish expert consensus and the AGREE II-GRS Instrument was applied to assess the methodological quality and externally validate the final statements. The statements were further discussed during a one-day face-to-face meeting at the 1st Summit on Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery in Wuhan, China. Findings: Twenty-eight international experts from 8 countries constructed the expert panel. Sixteen statements were produced by the members of the expert panel. At least 80% of responders agreed with the majority (80%) of statements. Other than three randomized controlled trials published to date, most evidences were based on level 3 or 4 studies according to the AGREE II-GRS Instrument. Conclusions and Relevance: The Wuhan international expert consensus meeting on LPD has produced a set of clinical practice statements for the safe development and progression of LPD. LPD is currently in its development and exploration stages, as defined by the international IDEAL framework for surgical innovation. More robust randomized controlled trial and registry study are essential to proceed with the assessment of LPD.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAME Publishing Company. The Journal's web site is located at https://hbsn.amegroups.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofHepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectConsensus-
dc.subjectpancreaticoduodenectomy-
dc.subjectlaparoscopy-
dc.subjectDelphi technique-
dc.titleInternational expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, TT: cheung68@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, TT=rp02129-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.21037/hbsn-20-446-
dc.identifier.pmid32832497-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7423539-
dc.identifier.hkuros326093-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage464-
dc.identifier.epage483-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000558182200007-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats