File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Different generalization of fast and slow visuomotor adaptation across locomotion and pointing tasks

TitleDifferent generalization of fast and slow visuomotor adaptation across locomotion and pointing tasks
Authors
KeywordsVisuomotor adaptation
Motor learning
Transfer
Generalization
Issue Date2021
PublisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00221/index.htm
Citation
Experimental Brain Research, 2021, v. 239, p. 2859-2871 How to Cite?
AbstractSensorimotor adaptation can involve multiple learning processes with different time courses, and these processes may have different patterns of transfer. In this study, we tested how slow learning and fast learning transfer across tasks, and the specificity of transfer. We tested two natural goal-directed tasks: pointing and walking toward a visible target. We also tested a novel 'hand locomotion' task in which subjects used pointing movements to cause simulated self-motion in virtual reality. The hand locomotion task used the same physical movement as pointing, but performed the same function as stepping. During an experimental block, subjects performed alternating training trials with perturbed visual feedback and test trials with no feedback. The test trials were either the same task to measure adaptation, or a different task to measure transfer. Perturbations on adaptation trials varied over time as a sum of sinusoids with different frequencies. Fast learning would be expected to produce equal responses to fast and slow perturbations, while slower learning would dampen responses to higher frequency perturbations. Subjects were generally not aware of the smoothly varying perturbations, but showed detectable adaptation for all three tasks. Only pointing produced significantly different responses to high- and low-frequency perturbations, consistent with slow learning. Adaptation of pointing produced more transfer to the hand locomotion task, which shared the same effector and motor actions, than to the stepping task. The other tasks showed fast learning but little or no slow learning, and equal transfer to tasks with different effector or function. Our results suggest that the slower components of sensorimotor adaptation are more movement specific, while faster learning is more generalizable.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305752
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.064
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.782
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXING, X-
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, JA-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T10:13:49Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-20T10:13:49Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationExperimental Brain Research, 2021, v. 239, p. 2859-2871-
dc.identifier.issn0014-4819-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/305752-
dc.description.abstractSensorimotor adaptation can involve multiple learning processes with different time courses, and these processes may have different patterns of transfer. In this study, we tested how slow learning and fast learning transfer across tasks, and the specificity of transfer. We tested two natural goal-directed tasks: pointing and walking toward a visible target. We also tested a novel 'hand locomotion' task in which subjects used pointing movements to cause simulated self-motion in virtual reality. The hand locomotion task used the same physical movement as pointing, but performed the same function as stepping. During an experimental block, subjects performed alternating training trials with perturbed visual feedback and test trials with no feedback. The test trials were either the same task to measure adaptation, or a different task to measure transfer. Perturbations on adaptation trials varied over time as a sum of sinusoids with different frequencies. Fast learning would be expected to produce equal responses to fast and slow perturbations, while slower learning would dampen responses to higher frequency perturbations. Subjects were generally not aware of the smoothly varying perturbations, but showed detectable adaptation for all three tasks. Only pointing produced significantly different responses to high- and low-frequency perturbations, consistent with slow learning. Adaptation of pointing produced more transfer to the hand locomotion task, which shared the same effector and motor actions, than to the stepping task. The other tasks showed fast learning but little or no slow learning, and equal transfer to tasks with different effector or function. Our results suggest that the slower components of sensorimotor adaptation are more movement specific, while faster learning is more generalizable.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00221/index.htm-
dc.relation.ispartofExperimental Brain Research-
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/[insert DOI]-
dc.subjectVisuomotor adaptation-
dc.subjectMotor learning-
dc.subjectTransfer-
dc.subjectGeneralization-
dc.titleDifferent generalization of fast and slow visuomotor adaptation across locomotion and pointing tasks-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailSaunders, JA: jsaun@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authoritySaunders, JA=rp00638-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00221-021-06112-w-
dc.identifier.pmid34292343-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85111086449-
dc.identifier.hkuros327683-
dc.identifier.volume239-
dc.identifier.spage2859-
dc.identifier.epage2871-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000678030800001-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats