File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Pilot study of a cluster randomised trial of a guided e-learning health promotion intervention for managers based on management standards for the improvement of employee well-being and reduction of sickness absence: GEM Study

TitlePilot study of a cluster randomised trial of a guided e-learning health promotion intervention for managers based on management standards for the improvement of employee well-being and reduction of sickness absence: GEM Study
Authors
Issue Date2015
Citation
BMJ Open, 2015, v. 5, n. 10, article no. e007981 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To investigate the feasibility of recruitment, adherence and likely effectiveness of an e-learning intervention for managers to improve employees' well-being and reduce sickness absence. Methods: The GEM Study (guided e-learning for managers) was a mixed methods pilot cluster randomised trial. Employees were recruited from four mental health services prior to randomising three services to the intervention and one to no-intervention control. Intervention managers received a facilitated e-learning programme on work-related stress. Main outcomes were Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS), 12-item GHQ and sickness absence <21 days from human resources. 35 in-depth interviews were undertaken with key informants, managers and employees, and additional observational data collected. Results: 424 of 649 (65%) employees approached consented, of whom 350 provided WEMWBS at baseline and 284 at follow-up; 41 managers out of 49 were recruited from the three intervention clusters and 21 adhered to the intervention. WEMWBS scores fell from 50.4-49.0 in the control (n=59) and 51.0-49.9 in the intervention (n=225), giving an intervention effect of 0.5 (95% CI-3.2 to 4.2). 120/225 intervention employees had a manager who was adherent to the intervention. HR data on sickness absence (n=393) showed no evidence of effect. There were no effects on GHQ score or work characteristics. Online quiz knowledge scores increased across the study in adherent managers. Qualitative data provided a rich picture of the context within which the intervention took place and managers' and employees' experiences of it. Conclusions: A small benefit from the intervention on well-being was explained by the mixed methods approach, implicating a low intervention uptake by managers and suggesting that education alone may be insufficient. A full trial of the guided e-learning intervention and economic evaluation is feasible. Future research should include more active encouragement of manager motivation, reflection and behaviour change. Trial Registration number: ISRCTN58661009.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307165
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStansfeld, Stephen A.-
dc.contributor.authorKerry, Sally-
dc.contributor.authorChandola, Tarani-
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Jill-
dc.contributor.authorBerney, Lee-
dc.contributor.authorHounsome, Natalia-
dc.contributor.authorLanz, Doris-
dc.contributor.authorCostelloe, Céire-
dc.contributor.authorSmuk, Melanie-
dc.contributor.authorBhui, Kamaldeep-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:22:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:22:04Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open, 2015, v. 5, n. 10, article no. e007981-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307165-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the feasibility of recruitment, adherence and likely effectiveness of an e-learning intervention for managers to improve employees' well-being and reduce sickness absence. Methods: The GEM Study (guided e-learning for managers) was a mixed methods pilot cluster randomised trial. Employees were recruited from four mental health services prior to randomising three services to the intervention and one to no-intervention control. Intervention managers received a facilitated e-learning programme on work-related stress. Main outcomes were Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS), 12-item GHQ and sickness absence <21 days from human resources. 35 in-depth interviews were undertaken with key informants, managers and employees, and additional observational data collected. Results: 424 of 649 (65%) employees approached consented, of whom 350 provided WEMWBS at baseline and 284 at follow-up; 41 managers out of 49 were recruited from the three intervention clusters and 21 adhered to the intervention. WEMWBS scores fell from 50.4-49.0 in the control (n=59) and 51.0-49.9 in the intervention (n=225), giving an intervention effect of 0.5 (95% CI-3.2 to 4.2). 120/225 intervention employees had a manager who was adherent to the intervention. HR data on sickness absence (n=393) showed no evidence of effect. There were no effects on GHQ score or work characteristics. Online quiz knowledge scores increased across the study in adherent managers. Qualitative data provided a rich picture of the context within which the intervention took place and managers' and employees' experiences of it. Conclusions: A small benefit from the intervention on well-being was explained by the mixed methods approach, implicating a low intervention uptake by managers and suggesting that education alone may be insufficient. A full trial of the guided e-learning intervention and economic evaluation is feasible. Future research should include more active encouragement of manager motivation, reflection and behaviour change. Trial Registration number: ISRCTN58661009.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titlePilot study of a cluster randomised trial of a guided e-learning health promotion intervention for managers based on management standards for the improvement of employee well-being and reduction of sickness absence: GEM Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007981-
dc.identifier.pmid26503383-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4636656-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84949484876-
dc.identifier.volume5-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e007981-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e007981-
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000365467600024-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats