File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Safety of magnetic resonance imaging scanning in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators incorporating quadripolar left ventricular leads

TitleSafety of magnetic resonance imaging scanning in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators incorporating quadripolar left ventricular leads
Authors
KeywordsCardiac resynchronization therapy
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Magnetic resonance imaging
Quadripolar lead
Ventricular fibrillation
Issue Date2020
PublisherElsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/heartrhythmjournal
Citation
Heart Rhythm, 2020, v. 17 n. 12, p. 2064-2071 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning of magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional cardiac implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can be performed safely following specific protocols. MRI safety with cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillators (CRT-Ds) incorporating quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads is less clear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ICDs and CRT-D systems with quadripolar LV leads after an MRI scan. Methods: The ENABLE MRI Study included 230 subjects implanted with a Boston Scientific ImageReady ICD (n = 39) or CRT-D (n = 191) incorporating quadripolar LV leads undergoing nondiagnostic 1.5-T MRI scans (lumbar and thoracic spine imaging) a minimum of 6 weeks postimplant. Pacing capture thresholds (PCTs), sensing amplitudes (SAs), and impedances were measured before and 1 month post-MRI using the same programmed LV pacing vectors. The ability to sense/treat ventricular fibrillation (VF) was assessed in a subset of patients. Results: A total of 159 patients completed a protocol-required MRI scan (MRI Protection Mode turned on) with no scan-related complications. All right ventricular (RV) and left LV PCT and SA effectiveness endpoints were met: RV PCT 99% (145/146 patients), LV PCT 100% (120/120), RV SA 99% (145/146), and LV SA 98% (116/118). In no instances did MRI result in a change in pacing vector or lead revision. All episodes of VF were appropriately sensed and treated. Conclusion: This first evaluation of predominantly CRT-D systems with quadripolar LV leads undergoing 1.5-T MRI confirmed that scanning was safe with no significant changes in RV/LV PCT, SA, programmed vectors, and VF treatment, thus suggesting that MRI in patients having a device with quadripolar leads can be performed without negative impact on CRT delivery.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307615
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.072
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRinaldi, CA-
dc.contributor.authorVitoff, PJ-
dc.contributor.authorNair, DR-
dc.contributor.authorBernstein, R-
dc.contributor.authorMountantonakis, SE-
dc.contributor.authorRapacciuolo, A-
dc.contributor.authorCarter, N-
dc.contributor.authorTse, HF-
dc.contributor.authorGreen, UB-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-12T13:35:12Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-12T13:35:12Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationHeart Rhythm, 2020, v. 17 n. 12, p. 2064-2071-
dc.identifier.issn1547-5271-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307615-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning of magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional cardiac implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can be performed safely following specific protocols. MRI safety with cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillators (CRT-Ds) incorporating quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads is less clear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ICDs and CRT-D systems with quadripolar LV leads after an MRI scan. Methods: The ENABLE MRI Study included 230 subjects implanted with a Boston Scientific ImageReady ICD (n = 39) or CRT-D (n = 191) incorporating quadripolar LV leads undergoing nondiagnostic 1.5-T MRI scans (lumbar and thoracic spine imaging) a minimum of 6 weeks postimplant. Pacing capture thresholds (PCTs), sensing amplitudes (SAs), and impedances were measured before and 1 month post-MRI using the same programmed LV pacing vectors. The ability to sense/treat ventricular fibrillation (VF) was assessed in a subset of patients. Results: A total of 159 patients completed a protocol-required MRI scan (MRI Protection Mode turned on) with no scan-related complications. All right ventricular (RV) and left LV PCT and SA effectiveness endpoints were met: RV PCT 99% (145/146 patients), LV PCT 100% (120/120), RV SA 99% (145/146), and LV SA 98% (116/118). In no instances did MRI result in a change in pacing vector or lead revision. All episodes of VF were appropriately sensed and treated. Conclusion: This first evaluation of predominantly CRT-D systems with quadripolar LV leads undergoing 1.5-T MRI confirmed that scanning was safe with no significant changes in RV/LV PCT, SA, programmed vectors, and VF treatment, thus suggesting that MRI in patients having a device with quadripolar leads can be performed without negative impact on CRT delivery.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/heartrhythmjournal-
dc.relation.ispartofHeart Rhythm-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCardiac resynchronization therapy-
dc.subjectImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator-
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subjectQuadripolar lead-
dc.subjectVentricular fibrillation-
dc.titleSafety of magnetic resonance imaging scanning in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators incorporating quadripolar left ventricular leads-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailTse, HF: hftse@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTse, HF=rp00428-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.020-
dc.identifier.pmid32911050-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85093672750-
dc.identifier.hkuros329276-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.spage2064-
dc.identifier.epage2071-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000594819400006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats