File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Community psychological and behavioural responses to coronavirus disease 2019 over one year of the pandemic in 2020 in Hong Kong

TitleCommunity psychological and behavioural responses to coronavirus disease 2019 over one year of the pandemic in 2020 in Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date2021
PublisherNature Research: Fully open access journals. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/srep/index.html
Citation
Scientific Reports, 2021, v. 11 n. 1, p. article no. 22480 How to Cite?
AbstractMonitoring community psychological and behavioural responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is important for informing policy making and risk communication to sustain public compliance with challenging precautionary behaviours and mitigating the psychological impacts. Monthly telephone-based cross-sectional surveys in January–April 2020 and then weekly surveys from May through December 2020 were conducted to monitor changes in public risk perception of COVID-19, personal efficacy in self-protection, confidence in government’s ability to control the pandemic, precautionary behaviours, perceived impact of precautionary behaviours, psychological fatigue and distress in Hong Kong, and examine their inter-relationships. While worry about contracting COVID-19 increased, personal efficacy and confidence in government declined as the community incidence of COVID-19 increased. The public maintained high compliance with most precautionary behaviours throughout but relaxed behaviours that were more challenging when disease incidence declined. Public confidence in government was persistently low throughout, of which, a lower level was associated with more psychological fatigue, lower compliance with precautionary behaviours and greater psychological distress. Perceived greater negative impact of precautionary behaviours was also associated with more psychological fatigue which in turn was associated with relaxation of precautionary behaviours. Female, younger and unemployed individuals reported greater psychological distress throughout different stages of the pandemic. Risk communication should focus on promoting confidence in self-protection and pandemic control to avoid helplessness to act when the pandemic resurges. Policy making should prioritize building public trust, enhancing support for sustaining precautionary behaviours, and helping vulnerable groups to adapt to the stress during the pandemic.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/308441
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.996
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.240
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Q-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, J-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, J-
dc.contributor.authorNg, TW-
dc.contributor.authorLam, WWT-
dc.contributor.authorNi, MY-
dc.contributor.authorCowling, B-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-01T07:53:23Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-01T07:53:23Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports, 2021, v. 11 n. 1, p. article no. 22480-
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/308441-
dc.description.abstractMonitoring community psychological and behavioural responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is important for informing policy making and risk communication to sustain public compliance with challenging precautionary behaviours and mitigating the psychological impacts. Monthly telephone-based cross-sectional surveys in January–April 2020 and then weekly surveys from May through December 2020 were conducted to monitor changes in public risk perception of COVID-19, personal efficacy in self-protection, confidence in government’s ability to control the pandemic, precautionary behaviours, perceived impact of precautionary behaviours, psychological fatigue and distress in Hong Kong, and examine their inter-relationships. While worry about contracting COVID-19 increased, personal efficacy and confidence in government declined as the community incidence of COVID-19 increased. The public maintained high compliance with most precautionary behaviours throughout but relaxed behaviours that were more challenging when disease incidence declined. Public confidence in government was persistently low throughout, of which, a lower level was associated with more psychological fatigue, lower compliance with precautionary behaviours and greater psychological distress. Perceived greater negative impact of precautionary behaviours was also associated with more psychological fatigue which in turn was associated with relaxation of precautionary behaviours. Female, younger and unemployed individuals reported greater psychological distress throughout different stages of the pandemic. Risk communication should focus on promoting confidence in self-protection and pandemic control to avoid helplessness to act when the pandemic resurges. Policy making should prioritize building public trust, enhancing support for sustaining precautionary behaviours, and helping vulnerable groups to adapt to the stress during the pandemic.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherNature Research: Fully open access journals. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/srep/index.html-
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports-
dc.rightsScientific Reports. Copyright © Nature Research: Fully open access journals.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleCommunity psychological and behavioural responses to coronavirus disease 2019 over one year of the pandemic in 2020 in Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLiao, Q: qyliao11@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailXiao, J: zoesiu0@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, J: ckhj@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, WWT: wwtlam@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailNi, MY: nimy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCowling, B: bcowling@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLiao, Q=rp02100-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, WWT=rp00443-
dc.identifier.authorityNi, MY=rp01639-
dc.identifier.authorityCowling, B=rp01326-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-021-00616-9-
dc.identifier.pmid34795312-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC8602294-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85119290149-
dc.identifier.hkuros330603-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 22480-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 22480-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000720520100045-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats