File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Blood pressure and risk of cancer: a Mendelian randomization study

TitleBlood pressure and risk of cancer: a Mendelian randomization study
Authors
KeywordsBlood pressure
Cancer
Mendelian Randomization
Issue Date2021
PublisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmccancer/
Citation
BMC Cancer, 2021, v. 21, article no. 1338 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Previous large observational cohort studies showed higher blood pressure (BP) positively associated with cancer. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to obtain less confounded estimates of BP on total and site-specific cancers. Methods: We applied replicated genetic instruments for systolic and diastolic BP to summary genetic associations with total cancer (37387 cases, 367856 non-cases) from the UK Biobank, and 17 site-specific cancers (663–17881 cases) from a meta-analysis of the UK Biobank and the Kaiser Permanente Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging. We used inverse-variance weighting with multiplicative random effects as the main analysis, and sensitivity analyses including the weighted median, MR-Egger and multivariable MR adjusted for body mass index and for smoking. For validation, we included breast (Breast Cancer Association Consortium: 133384 cases, 113789 non-cases), prostate (Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer Associated Alterations in the Genome Consortium: 79194 cases, 61112 non-cases) and lung (International Lung and Cancer Consortium: 10246 cases, 38295 non-cases) cancer from large consortia. We used asthma as a negative control outcome. Results: Systolic and diastolic BP were unrelated to total cancer (OR 0.98 per standard deviation higher [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89, 1.07] and OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.92, 1.08]) and to site-specific cancers after accounting for multiple testing, with consistent findings from consortia. BP was nominally associated with melanoma and possibly kidney cancer, and as expected, not associated with asthma. Sensitivity analyses using other MR methods gave similar results. Conclusions: In contrast to previous observational evidence, BP does not appear to be a risk factor for cancer, although an effect on melanoma and kidney cancer cannot be excluded. Other targets for cancer prevention might be more relevant.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309360
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.087
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, II-
dc.contributor.authorKwok, MK-
dc.contributor.authorSchooling, CM-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T02:14:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-29T02:14:00Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Cancer, 2021, v. 21, article no. 1338-
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309360-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Previous large observational cohort studies showed higher blood pressure (BP) positively associated with cancer. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to obtain less confounded estimates of BP on total and site-specific cancers. Methods: We applied replicated genetic instruments for systolic and diastolic BP to summary genetic associations with total cancer (37387 cases, 367856 non-cases) from the UK Biobank, and 17 site-specific cancers (663–17881 cases) from a meta-analysis of the UK Biobank and the Kaiser Permanente Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging. We used inverse-variance weighting with multiplicative random effects as the main analysis, and sensitivity analyses including the weighted median, MR-Egger and multivariable MR adjusted for body mass index and for smoking. For validation, we included breast (Breast Cancer Association Consortium: 133384 cases, 113789 non-cases), prostate (Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer Associated Alterations in the Genome Consortium: 79194 cases, 61112 non-cases) and lung (International Lung and Cancer Consortium: 10246 cases, 38295 non-cases) cancer from large consortia. We used asthma as a negative control outcome. Results: Systolic and diastolic BP were unrelated to total cancer (OR 0.98 per standard deviation higher [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89, 1.07] and OR 1.00 [95% CI 0.92, 1.08]) and to site-specific cancers after accounting for multiple testing, with consistent findings from consortia. BP was nominally associated with melanoma and possibly kidney cancer, and as expected, not associated with asthma. Sensitivity analyses using other MR methods gave similar results. Conclusions: In contrast to previous observational evidence, BP does not appear to be a risk factor for cancer, although an effect on melanoma and kidney cancer cannot be excluded. Other targets for cancer prevention might be more relevant.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmccancer/-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Cancer-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBlood pressure-
dc.subjectCancer-
dc.subjectMendelian Randomization-
dc.titleBlood pressure and risk of cancer: a Mendelian randomization study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailKwok, MK: maggiek@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailSchooling, CM: cms1@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityKwok, MK=rp02051-
dc.identifier.authoritySchooling, CM=rp00504-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-021-09067-x-
dc.identifier.pmid34915881-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC8675492-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85121440207-
dc.identifier.hkuros331330-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 1338-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 1338-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000730966800001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats