File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning

TitleDeveloping China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning
Authors
Issue Date2018
Citation
Nature Communications, 2018, v. 9, n. 1, article no. 3034 How to Cite?
AbstractEcosystems services (ES) assessment is a significant scientific topic recognized for its potential to address sustainability issues. However, there is an absence of science–policy frameworks in land use planning that lead to the ES science being used in policy. China’s Ecological Redline Policy (ERP) is one of the first national policies utilizing multiple ES, but there is no standardized approach for working across the science–policy interface. We propose a transdisciplinary framework to determine ecological redline areas (ERAs) in Shanghai using: ES, biodiversity and ecologically fragile hotspots, landscape structure, and stakeholder opinions. We determine the five criteria to identify ERAs for Shanghai using multi-temporal, high resolution images (0.5 m) and biophysical models. We examine ERP effectiveness by comparing land use scenarios for 2040. Compared to alternative land uses, ES increase significantly under the ERP. The inclusion of ES in spatial planning led stakeholders to increase terrestrial habitat protection by 174% in Shanghai. Our analysis suggests that strategic planning for ES could reduce tradeoffs between environmental quality and development.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309575
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBai, Yang-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Christina P.-
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Bo-
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Alice C.-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Min-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qing-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T07:02:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-29T07:02:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationNature Communications, 2018, v. 9, n. 1, article no. 3034-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309575-
dc.description.abstractEcosystems services (ES) assessment is a significant scientific topic recognized for its potential to address sustainability issues. However, there is an absence of science–policy frameworks in land use planning that lead to the ES science being used in policy. China’s Ecological Redline Policy (ERP) is one of the first national policies utilizing multiple ES, but there is no standardized approach for working across the science–policy interface. We propose a transdisciplinary framework to determine ecological redline areas (ERAs) in Shanghai using: ES, biodiversity and ecologically fragile hotspots, landscape structure, and stakeholder opinions. We determine the five criteria to identify ERAs for Shanghai using multi-temporal, high resolution images (0.5 m) and biophysical models. We examine ERP effectiveness by comparing land use scenarios for 2040. Compared to alternative land uses, ES increase significantly under the ERP. The inclusion of ES in spatial planning led stakeholders to increase terrestrial habitat protection by 174% in Shanghai. Our analysis suggests that strategic planning for ES could reduce tradeoffs between environmental quality and development.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNature Communications-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleDeveloping China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41467-018-05306-1-
dc.identifier.pmid30072771-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6072749-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85051076895-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 3034-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 3034-
dc.identifier.eissn2041-1723-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000440617500010-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats