File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Evaluating comprehensive carbon emissions of solidification/stabilization technologies: a case study

TitleEvaluating comprehensive carbon emissions of solidification/stabilization technologies: a case study
Authors
KeywordsStabilization/solidification
carbon emissions
contaminated sediment
municipal solid waste incineration fly ash
concrete slurry waste
Issue Date2022
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Evaluating comprehensive carbon emissions of solidification/stabilization technologies: a case study. In Tsang, DCW & Wang, L (Eds.), Low Carbon Stabilization and Solidification of Hazardous Wastes, p. 517-530. Amsterdam ; Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2022 How to Cite?
AbstractConsidering the overexploitation of resources and environmental consequences, sustainable management and resourceful utilization of different waste materials are of great research interest globally. Among different strategies, cement-based stabilization/solidification (S/S) technology has been recently considered as a highly efficient technique. Considering the limited studies on environmental impacts, the carbon emissions of recently developed S/S technologies for sustainable three hazardous wastes materials, viz. contaminated marine sediment (CS), municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MIFA), and concrete slurry waste (CSW), were evaluated by using the life cycle assessment (LCA) technique. For comparative analysis, a number of scenarios under different strategies for CS and MIFA S/S technologies, and several scenarios of CSW utilizations were developed. Based on the LCA results, the most sustainable scenarios for the studied waste materials were identified along with their contribution analysis for future potential improvement. For instance, the use of alternative binders, including the supplementary cementitious materials instead of ordinary Portland cement, and other recycled materials including recycled aggregates can significantly reduce the carbon emissions for both CS and MIFA. However, the utilization of fresh CSW for producing concrete partition wall blocks reduces carbon emission significantly. The results can help the selection of low-carbon strategies and scenarios for practical application of resourceful utilization and management of the studied waste materials.
DescriptionChapter 31
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310144
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHossain, MU-
dc.contributor.authorWang, L-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, DCW-
dc.contributor.authorNg, TST-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, CS-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T02:24:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-24T02:24:30Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationEvaluating comprehensive carbon emissions of solidification/stabilization technologies: a case study. In Tsang, DCW & Wang, L (Eds.), Low Carbon Stabilization and Solidification of Hazardous Wastes, p. 517-530. Amsterdam ; Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2022-
dc.identifier.isbn9780128240045-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310144-
dc.descriptionChapter 31-
dc.description.abstractConsidering the overexploitation of resources and environmental consequences, sustainable management and resourceful utilization of different waste materials are of great research interest globally. Among different strategies, cement-based stabilization/solidification (S/S) technology has been recently considered as a highly efficient technique. Considering the limited studies on environmental impacts, the carbon emissions of recently developed S/S technologies for sustainable three hazardous wastes materials, viz. contaminated marine sediment (CS), municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MIFA), and concrete slurry waste (CSW), were evaluated by using the life cycle assessment (LCA) technique. For comparative analysis, a number of scenarios under different strategies for CS and MIFA S/S technologies, and several scenarios of CSW utilizations were developed. Based on the LCA results, the most sustainable scenarios for the studied waste materials were identified along with their contribution analysis for future potential improvement. For instance, the use of alternative binders, including the supplementary cementitious materials instead of ordinary Portland cement, and other recycled materials including recycled aggregates can significantly reduce the carbon emissions for both CS and MIFA. However, the utilization of fresh CSW for producing concrete partition wall blocks reduces carbon emission significantly. The results can help the selection of low-carbon strategies and scenarios for practical application of resourceful utilization and management of the studied waste materials.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofLow Carbon Stabilization and Solidification of Hazardous Wastes-
dc.subjectStabilization/solidification-
dc.subjectcarbon emissions-
dc.subjectcontaminated sediment-
dc.subjectmunicipal solid waste incineration fly ash-
dc.subjectconcrete slurry waste-
dc.titleEvaluating comprehensive carbon emissions of solidification/stabilization technologies: a case study-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailHossain, MU: uzzal@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHossain, MU=rp02580-
dc.identifier.authorityNg, TST=rp00158-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/B978-0-12-824004-5.00018-9-
dc.identifier.hkuros331469-
dc.identifier.spage517-
dc.identifier.epage530-
dc.publisher.placeAmsterdam ; Oxford, UK-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats