File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Subnational Constitutionalism: Hong Kong

TitleSubnational Constitutionalism: Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsSubnational Constitutionalism
Hong Kong
Subnational Constitutions
Asymmetric Constitutionalism
Autonomy
Issue Date2022
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
Subnational Constitutionalism: Hong Kong. In Law, DS (Ed.), Constitutionalism in Context, p. 377-402. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022 How to Cite?
AbstractThis chapter uses Hong Kong to illustrate the unique constitutional law challenges facing subnational jurisdictions, including that of dividing competences between the subnational and national authorities, of finding a mutually agreeable conflict resolution mechanism and of defining the place of the subnational constitution within the national constitutional order. As the only liberal, common law jurisdiction within a socialist party-state in the world, Hong Kong’s two decades of experience with China’s “one country, two systems” governing model illustrates how fraught the challenges facing a subnational constitution could be. Yet further reflection upon how Hong Kong can preserve its liberal constitutionalist status suggests creative solutions to those challenges.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310619
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, CSW-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-07T07:59:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-07T07:59:23Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationSubnational Constitutionalism: Hong Kong. In Law, DS (Ed.), Constitutionalism in Context, p. 377-402. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1108427098-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310619-
dc.description.abstractThis chapter uses Hong Kong to illustrate the unique constitutional law challenges facing subnational jurisdictions, including that of dividing competences between the subnational and national authorities, of finding a mutually agreeable conflict resolution mechanism and of defining the place of the subnational constitution within the national constitutional order. As the only liberal, common law jurisdiction within a socialist party-state in the world, Hong Kong’s two decades of experience with China’s “one country, two systems” governing model illustrates how fraught the challenges facing a subnational constitution could be. Yet further reflection upon how Hong Kong can preserve its liberal constitutionalist status suggests creative solutions to those challenges.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofConstitutionalism in Context-
dc.subjectSubnational Constitutionalism-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.subjectSubnational Constitutions-
dc.subjectAsymmetric Constitutionalism-
dc.subjectAutonomy-
dc.titleSubnational Constitutionalism: Hong Kong-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailChan, CSW: corachan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, CSW=rp01296-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/9781108699068.018-
dc.identifier.hkuros331789-
dc.identifier.spage377-
dc.identifier.epage402-
dc.publisher.placeCambridge, UK ; New York-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats