File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/0193945920979668
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85098511640
- PMID: 33371826
- WOS: WOS:000627537600001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Review of Food Intake Difficulty Assessment Tools for People with Dementia
Title | Review of Food Intake Difficulty Assessment Tools for People with Dementia |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | assessment tools feeding behaviour feeding difficulty people with dementia |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Citation | Western Journal of Nursing Research, 2021, v. 43, n. 12, p. 1132-1145 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This review aimed to summarise the validity and reliability of feeding difficulties assessment tools for Individual with dementia. PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus were searched for feeding difficulty measurements studies published between 1990 and 2019. Sixteen publications were included and identified three tools: Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia (EdFED), Feeding Behaviour Inventory (FBI), and Feeding Difficulty Index (FDI). Results showed the EdFED was translated and tested in various languages. The EdFED and FDI demonstrated high content and construct validity. The FBI was not validated. The EdFED had high inter-rater reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.75 to 0.90. The FDI and FBI showed moderate inter-rater reliability. Although the EdFED has been tested and widely used, unlike FDI, which addresses multi-aspects of feeding difficulty. The FDI have higher clinical utility but future research needs to test the psychometric properties of FDI to determine its effectiveness in assessing feeding difficulties. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/310874 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.729 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Spencer, Jia Ci | - |
dc.contributor.author | Damanik, Riris | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Mu Hsing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Montayre, Jed | - |
dc.contributor.author | Traynor, Victoria | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chang, Chia Chi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chang, Hui Chen | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-25T04:41:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-25T04:41:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Western Journal of Nursing Research, 2021, v. 43, n. 12, p. 1132-1145 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0193-9459 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/310874 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This review aimed to summarise the validity and reliability of feeding difficulties assessment tools for Individual with dementia. PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus were searched for feeding difficulty measurements studies published between 1990 and 2019. Sixteen publications were included and identified three tools: Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia (EdFED), Feeding Behaviour Inventory (FBI), and Feeding Difficulty Index (FDI). Results showed the EdFED was translated and tested in various languages. The EdFED and FDI demonstrated high content and construct validity. The FBI was not validated. The EdFED had high inter-rater reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.75 to 0.90. The FDI and FBI showed moderate inter-rater reliability. Although the EdFED has been tested and widely used, unlike FDI, which addresses multi-aspects of feeding difficulty. The FDI have higher clinical utility but future research needs to test the psychometric properties of FDI to determine its effectiveness in assessing feeding difficulties. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Western Journal of Nursing Research | - |
dc.subject | assessment tools | - |
dc.subject | feeding behaviour | - |
dc.subject | feeding difficulty | - |
dc.subject | people with dementia | - |
dc.title | Review of Food Intake Difficulty Assessment Tools for People with Dementia | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0193945920979668 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33371826 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85098511640 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1132 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1145 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1552-8456 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000627537600001 | - |