File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Decision-Making in People With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review of Decision-Making Tools

TitleDecision-Making in People With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review of Decision-Making Tools
Authors
KeywordsCapacity
decision aids
decision-making
dementia
mild cognitive impairment
narrative review
Issue Date2021
Citation
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2021, v. 22, n. 10, p. 2056-2062.e4 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: This review summarized the applicability of various decision-making tools for helping people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their families make decisions. Design: This study was a narrative literature review. The protocol of this review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020182259). Setting and Participants: People with dementia or MCI and their families were included in this study. Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Chinese Electronic Periodical Services databases from inception to May 2021. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists for a variety of study designs were used. Results: Topics related to decision-making were categorized as everyday activity decisions or medical treatment decisions. Various types of decision-making tools were identified, and we observed that decision aids can be modified and used for both everyday activity decisions and medical treatment decisions. In addition to highlighting decision aids for specific decisional issues and topics, we also elucidated other validated tools that can be used to facilitate the decision-making process. Conclusions and Implications: This study highlighted the topics involved in decision-making and using decision-making tools. The current review provides information that can help individuals and health care professionals choose optimal decision-making tools. On the basis of our findings, future studies can determine the most appropriate tools for intervention or outcome measures.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310883
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.592
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo, Mu Hsing-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Hui Chen (Rita)-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Megan F.-
dc.contributor.authorChien, Hui Wen-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Li Yu-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Su Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Su Hui-
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Shibu-
dc.contributor.authorTraynor, Victoria-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-25T04:41:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-25T04:41:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2021, v. 22, n. 10, p. 2056-2062.e4-
dc.identifier.issn1525-8610-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/310883-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This review summarized the applicability of various decision-making tools for helping people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and their families make decisions. Design: This study was a narrative literature review. The protocol of this review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020182259). Setting and Participants: People with dementia or MCI and their families were included in this study. Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Chinese Electronic Periodical Services databases from inception to May 2021. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists for a variety of study designs were used. Results: Topics related to decision-making were categorized as everyday activity decisions or medical treatment decisions. Various types of decision-making tools were identified, and we observed that decision aids can be modified and used for both everyday activity decisions and medical treatment decisions. In addition to highlighting decision aids for specific decisional issues and topics, we also elucidated other validated tools that can be used to facilitate the decision-making process. Conclusions and Implications: This study highlighted the topics involved in decision-making and using decision-making tools. The current review provides information that can help individuals and health care professionals choose optimal decision-making tools. On the basis of our findings, future studies can determine the most appropriate tools for intervention or outcome measures.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Medical Directors Association-
dc.subjectCapacity-
dc.subjectdecision aids-
dc.subjectdecision-making-
dc.subjectdementia-
dc.subjectmild cognitive impairment-
dc.subjectnarrative review-
dc.titleDecision-Making in People With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review of Decision-Making Tools-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jamda.2021.06.034-
dc.identifier.pmid34314703-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85112654540-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage2056-
dc.identifier.epage2062.e4-
dc.identifier.eissn1538-9375-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000703174500016-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats