File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The patchwork metropolis: The morphology of the divided postindustrial city

TitleThe patchwork metropolis: The morphology of the divided postindustrial city
Authors
Issue Date2018
Citation
Journal of Urban Affairs, 2018, v. 40, n. 5, p. 609-624 How to Cite?
AbstractThis research examines the new divides and changing structure of the modern city and metropolis. Since the classic Chicago School models, the urban form of the metropolis has been conceptualized as a divided space, where affluent suburbs surround a less-advantaged and denser urban core. More recently, the concept of a great inversion has been advanced to capture the return of more advantaged groups to the urban center and the outward shift of poverty and disadvantage to the suburbs. To gain insight into contemporary urban form, we undertake a descriptive mapping exercise of the residential locations of three major classes—the advantaged class of knowledge, professionals and creative workers, the declining blue collar working class, and the less advantaged service class of workers—across a dozen of America’s largest metro areas and their core cities. We find a pattern of class division and urban form that we refer to as the “patchwork metropolis,” where class divides cut across city and suburb alike. These divides appear to be conditioned by the location of the advantaged class that occupies and clusters around the most functional and desirable areas of the metropolis—close to the urban core, around transit, near knowledge institutions, and along areas of natural amenities. The less-advantaged classes are shunted into the spaces leftover or in between—either traditionally disadvantaged areas of the inner city or the fringes of the suburban and exurban periphery.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311439
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.775
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFlorida, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorAdler, Patrick-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-22T11:53:56Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-22T11:53:56Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Urban Affairs, 2018, v. 40, n. 5, p. 609-624-
dc.identifier.issn0735-2166-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/311439-
dc.description.abstractThis research examines the new divides and changing structure of the modern city and metropolis. Since the classic Chicago School models, the urban form of the metropolis has been conceptualized as a divided space, where affluent suburbs surround a less-advantaged and denser urban core. More recently, the concept of a great inversion has been advanced to capture the return of more advantaged groups to the urban center and the outward shift of poverty and disadvantage to the suburbs. To gain insight into contemporary urban form, we undertake a descriptive mapping exercise of the residential locations of three major classes—the advantaged class of knowledge, professionals and creative workers, the declining blue collar working class, and the less advantaged service class of workers—across a dozen of America’s largest metro areas and their core cities. We find a pattern of class division and urban form that we refer to as the “patchwork metropolis,” where class divides cut across city and suburb alike. These divides appear to be conditioned by the location of the advantaged class that occupies and clusters around the most functional and desirable areas of the metropolis—close to the urban core, around transit, near knowledge institutions, and along areas of natural amenities. The less-advantaged classes are shunted into the spaces leftover or in between—either traditionally disadvantaged areas of the inner city or the fringes of the suburban and exurban periphery.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Urban Affairs-
dc.titleThe patchwork metropolis: The morphology of the divided postindustrial city-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07352166.2017.1360743-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85041605581-
dc.identifier.volume40-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage609-
dc.identifier.epage624-
dc.identifier.eissn1467-9906-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000436444200001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats