File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Ostracods in databases: State of the art, mobilization and future applications

TitleOstracods in databases: State of the art, mobilization and future applications
Authors
Issue Date2022
Citation
Marine Micropaleontology, 2022, p. 102094 How to Cite?
AbstractBiodiversity databases are changing the longevity of data in the era of open science. They also represent a collaboration opportunity in analyzing large-scale (paleo)biological patterns beyond a local project or a time scale. Ostracods, microscopic crustaceans, are a component in many biodiversity databases. They live in most kinds of aquatic environments today and their fossil record spans nearly the whole of the Earth's metazoan biosphere history from Ordovician to Holocene. Thus, ostracods provide an ideal model system for understanding large-scale biodiversity patterns and dynamics in both space and time. Thanks to many contributors, current and future ostracodologists have access to databases that have gone through numerous improvements and have been populated by many datasets. However, rapid growth of databases has caused confusion among users regarding available data, technical terms and database aims. We review key databases that include ostracods, summarizing their history of development, current spatial and temporal coverage, various types of data models and the intertwined relationships between databases. We also present a quantitative summary of ostracod diversity history based on the Paleobiology Database. Our investigations show that the database field is transitioning from the traditional single focus to multipurpose, from static to dynamic data display/download and from independent systems to collaborative networks. We compare the ways several databases approach persistent challenges such as taxonomic harmonization, validation of the original sampling metadata and paleolocality uncertainties. With increasing capability of data integration, databases continue to require enormous efforts regarding high-quality data entry and careful coordination among scientists and technical teams.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/312246
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.102
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.761
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, HH-
dc.contributor.authorYasuhara, M-
dc.contributor.authorHorne, DJ-
dc.contributor.authorPerrier, V-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorBrandão, SN-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T01:37:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-25T01:37:09Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationMarine Micropaleontology, 2022, p. 102094-
dc.identifier.issn0377-8398-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/312246-
dc.description.abstractBiodiversity databases are changing the longevity of data in the era of open science. They also represent a collaboration opportunity in analyzing large-scale (paleo)biological patterns beyond a local project or a time scale. Ostracods, microscopic crustaceans, are a component in many biodiversity databases. They live in most kinds of aquatic environments today and their fossil record spans nearly the whole of the Earth's metazoan biosphere history from Ordovician to Holocene. Thus, ostracods provide an ideal model system for understanding large-scale biodiversity patterns and dynamics in both space and time. Thanks to many contributors, current and future ostracodologists have access to databases that have gone through numerous improvements and have been populated by many datasets. However, rapid growth of databases has caused confusion among users regarding available data, technical terms and database aims. We review key databases that include ostracods, summarizing their history of development, current spatial and temporal coverage, various types of data models and the intertwined relationships between databases. We also present a quantitative summary of ostracod diversity history based on the Paleobiology Database. Our investigations show that the database field is transitioning from the traditional single focus to multipurpose, from static to dynamic data display/download and from independent systems to collaborative networks. We compare the ways several databases approach persistent challenges such as taxonomic harmonization, validation of the original sampling metadata and paleolocality uncertainties. With increasing capability of data integration, databases continue to require enormous efforts regarding high-quality data entry and careful coordination among scientists and technical teams.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMarine Micropaleontology-
dc.titleOstracods in databases: State of the art, mobilization and future applications-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYasuhara, M: yasuhara@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYasuhara, M=rp01474-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marmicro.2022.102094-
dc.identifier.hkuros332670-
dc.identifier.spage102094-
dc.identifier.epage102094-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000829304000003-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats