File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Business not as usual - The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others
Title | Business not as usual - The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Business interruption insurance Causation Coronavirus Insurance contracts Insured perils Interpretation Losses Policy wordings |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=476&productid=7128 |
Citation | Journal of Business Law, 2022, n. 4, p. 257-282 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The United Kingdom (UK) Supreme Court’s decision in The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) v Arch and Others is of considerable significance. It is arguably the leading authority, not just in the UK but elsewhere in the common law world, on the response of business interruption insurance (BII) policies to claims arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. This article explains the nature of BII policies and the law in England and Wales prior to the decision in FCA v Arch. It then examines the Supreme Court’s decision in detail before reflecting on its wider implications for policyholders, insurers and others. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/313253 |
ISSN | |
SSRN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Meggitt, G | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-06T05:48:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-06T05:48:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Business Law, 2022, n. 4, p. 257-282 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-9460 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/313253 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The United Kingdom (UK) Supreme Court’s decision in The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) v Arch and Others is of considerable significance. It is arguably the leading authority, not just in the UK but elsewhere in the common law world, on the response of business interruption insurance (BII) policies to claims arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. This article explains the nature of BII policies and the law in England and Wales prior to the decision in FCA v Arch. It then examines the Supreme Court’s decision in detail before reflecting on its wider implications for policyholders, insurers and others. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=476&productid=7128 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Business Law | - |
dc.subject | Business interruption insurance | - |
dc.subject | Causation | - |
dc.subject | Coronavirus | - |
dc.subject | Insurance contracts | - |
dc.subject | Insured perils | - |
dc.subject | Interpretation | - |
dc.subject | Losses | - |
dc.subject | Policy wordings | - |
dc.title | Business not as usual - The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Meggitt, G: garym@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Meggitt, G=rp01284 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 333265 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 257 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 282 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.ssrn | 4119488 | - |
dc.identifier.hkulrp | 2022/30 | - |