File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Business not as usual - The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others

TitleBusiness not as usual - The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others
Authors
KeywordsBusiness interruption insurance
Causation
Coronavirus
Insurance contracts
Insured perils
Interpretation
Losses
Policy wordings
Issue Date2022
PublisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=476&productid=7128
Citation
Journal of Business Law, 2022, n. 4, p. 257-282 How to Cite?
AbstractThe United Kingdom (UK) Supreme Court’s decision in The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) v Arch and Others is of considerable significance. It is arguably the leading authority, not just in the UK but elsewhere in the common law world, on the response of business interruption insurance (BII) policies to claims arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. This article explains the nature of BII policies and the law in England and Wales prior to the decision in FCA v Arch. It then examines the Supreme Court’s decision in detail before reflecting on its wider implications for policyholders, insurers and others.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/313253
ISSN
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeggitt, G-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-06T05:48:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-06T05:48:20Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Business Law, 2022, n. 4, p. 257-282-
dc.identifier.issn0021-9460-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/313253-
dc.description.abstractThe United Kingdom (UK) Supreme Court’s decision in The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) v Arch and Others is of considerable significance. It is arguably the leading authority, not just in the UK but elsewhere in the common law world, on the response of business interruption insurance (BII) policies to claims arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. This article explains the nature of BII policies and the law in England and Wales prior to the decision in FCA v Arch. It then examines the Supreme Court’s decision in detail before reflecting on its wider implications for policyholders, insurers and others.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=476&productid=7128-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Business Law-
dc.subjectBusiness interruption insurance-
dc.subjectCausation-
dc.subjectCoronavirus-
dc.subjectInsurance contracts-
dc.subjectInsured perils-
dc.subjectInterpretation-
dc.subjectLosses-
dc.subjectPolicy wordings-
dc.titleBusiness not as usual - The Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and Others-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailMeggitt, G: garym@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMeggitt, G=rp01284-
dc.identifier.hkuros333265-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage257-
dc.identifier.epage282-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.ssrn4119488-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2022/30-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats