File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: MRI surrogates for molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma

TitleMRI surrogates for molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma
Authors
Issue Date2014
Citation
American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2014, v. 35, n. 7, p. 1263-1269 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently identified molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma have shown potential for improved risk stratification. We hypothesized that distinct MR imaging features can predict these subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma at one institution, with both pretherapy MR imaging and surgical tissue, served as the discovery cohort (n = 47). MR imaging features were assessed by 3 blinded neuroradiologists. NanoString-based assay of tumor tissues was conducted to classify the tumors into the 4 established molecular subgroups (wingless, sonic hedgehog, group 3, and group 4). A second pediatric medulloblastoma cohort (n = 52) from an independent institution was used for validation of the MR imaging features predictive of the molecular subtypes. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis within the discovery cohort revealed tumor location (P < .001) and enhancement pattern (P = .001) to be significant predictors of medulloblastoma subgroups. Stereospecific computational analyses confirmed that group 3 and 4 tumors predominated within the midline fourth ventricle (100%, P = .007), wingless tumors were localized to the cerebellar peduncle/cerebellopontine angle cistern with a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 30%-100%), and sonic hedgehog tumors arose in the cerebellar hemispheres with a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 59%-100%). Midline group 4 tumors presented with minimal/no enhancement with a positive predictive value of 91% (95% CI, 59%-98%). When we used the MR imaging feature-based regression model, 66% of medulloblastomas were correctly predicted in the discovery cohort, and 65%, in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location and enhancement pattern were predictive of molecular subgroups of pediatric medulloblastoma and may potentially serve as a surrogate for genomic testing.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/313964
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.020
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPerreault, S.-
dc.contributor.authorRamaswamy, V.-
dc.contributor.authorAchrol, A. S.-
dc.contributor.authorChao, K.-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, T. T.-
dc.contributor.authorShih, D.-
dc.contributor.authorRemke, M.-
dc.contributor.authorSchubert, S.-
dc.contributor.authorBouffet, E.-
dc.contributor.authorFisher, P. G.-
dc.contributor.authorPartap, S.-
dc.contributor.authorVogel, H.-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, M. D.-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Y. J.-
dc.contributor.authorYeom, Kristen W.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T11:28:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-06T11:28:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology, 2014, v. 35, n. 7, p. 1263-1269-
dc.identifier.issn0195-6108-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/313964-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently identified molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma have shown potential for improved risk stratification. We hypothesized that distinct MR imaging features can predict these subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma at one institution, with both pretherapy MR imaging and surgical tissue, served as the discovery cohort (n = 47). MR imaging features were assessed by 3 blinded neuroradiologists. NanoString-based assay of tumor tissues was conducted to classify the tumors into the 4 established molecular subgroups (wingless, sonic hedgehog, group 3, and group 4). A second pediatric medulloblastoma cohort (n = 52) from an independent institution was used for validation of the MR imaging features predictive of the molecular subtypes. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis within the discovery cohort revealed tumor location (P < .001) and enhancement pattern (P = .001) to be significant predictors of medulloblastoma subgroups. Stereospecific computational analyses confirmed that group 3 and 4 tumors predominated within the midline fourth ventricle (100%, P = .007), wingless tumors were localized to the cerebellar peduncle/cerebellopontine angle cistern with a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 30%-100%), and sonic hedgehog tumors arose in the cerebellar hemispheres with a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 59%-100%). Midline group 4 tumors presented with minimal/no enhancement with a positive predictive value of 91% (95% CI, 59%-98%). When we used the MR imaging feature-based regression model, 66% of medulloblastomas were correctly predicted in the discovery cohort, and 65%, in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location and enhancement pattern were predictive of molecular subgroups of pediatric medulloblastoma and may potentially serve as a surrogate for genomic testing.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology-
dc.titleMRI surrogates for molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3174/ajnr.A3990-
dc.identifier.pmid24831600-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4819007-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84905033770-
dc.identifier.volume35-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage1263-
dc.identifier.epage1269-
dc.identifier.eissn1936-959X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000339138200005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats