File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Assessing the clinical utility of genetic risk scores for targeted cancer screening

TitleAssessing the clinical utility of genetic risk scores for targeted cancer screening
Authors
KeywordsBreast cancer
Cancer screening
Colorectal cancer
Genetic risk score
Prostate cancer
Single nucleotide polymorphism
Translational genomics
Issue Date2021
Citation
Journal of Translational Medicine, 2021, v. 19, n. 1, article no. 41 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Genome-wide association studies have identified thousands of disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A subset of these SNPs may be additively combined to generate genetic risk scores (GRSs) that confer risk for a specific disease. Although the clinical validity of GRSs to predict risk of specific diseases has been well established, there is still a great need to determine their clinical utility by applying GRSs in primary care for cancer risk assessment and targeted intervention. Methods: This clinical study involved 281 primary care patients without a personal history of breast, prostate or colorectal cancer who were 40–70 years old. DNA was obtained from a pre-existing biobank at NorthShore University HealthSystem. GRSs for colorectal cancer and breast or prostate cancer were calculated and shared with participants through their primary care provider. Additional data was gathered using questionnaires as well as electronic medical record information. A t-test or Chi-square test was applied for comparison of demographic and key clinical variables among different groups. Results: The median age of the 281 participants was 58 years and the majority were female (66.6%). One hundred one (36.9%) participants received 2 low risk scores, 99 (35.2%) received 1 low risk and 1 average risk score, 37 (13.2%) received 1 low risk and 1 high risk score, 23 (8.2%) received 2 average risk scores, 21 (7.5%) received 1 average risk and 1 high risk score, and no one received 2 high risk scores. Before receiving GRSs, younger patients and women reported significantly more worry about risk of developing cancer. After receiving GRSs, those who received at least one high GRS reported significantly more worry about developing cancer. There were no significant differences found between gender, age, or GRS with regards to participants’ reported optimism about their future health neither before nor after receiving GRS results. Conclusions: Genetic risk scores that quantify an individual’s risk of developing breast, prostate and colorectal cancers as compared with a race-defined population average risk have potential clinical utility as a tool for risk stratification and to guide cancer screening in a primary care setting.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/314373
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConran, Carly A.-
dc.contributor.authorShi, Zhuqing-
dc.contributor.authorResurreccion, William Kyle-
dc.contributor.authorNa, Rong-
dc.contributor.authorHelfand, Brian T.-
dc.contributor.authorGenova, Elena-
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Siqun Lilly-
dc.contributor.authorBrendler, Charles B.-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Jianfeng-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-20T12:03:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-20T12:03:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Translational Medicine, 2021, v. 19, n. 1, article no. 41-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/314373-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Genome-wide association studies have identified thousands of disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A subset of these SNPs may be additively combined to generate genetic risk scores (GRSs) that confer risk for a specific disease. Although the clinical validity of GRSs to predict risk of specific diseases has been well established, there is still a great need to determine their clinical utility by applying GRSs in primary care for cancer risk assessment and targeted intervention. Methods: This clinical study involved 281 primary care patients without a personal history of breast, prostate or colorectal cancer who were 40–70 years old. DNA was obtained from a pre-existing biobank at NorthShore University HealthSystem. GRSs for colorectal cancer and breast or prostate cancer were calculated and shared with participants through their primary care provider. Additional data was gathered using questionnaires as well as electronic medical record information. A t-test or Chi-square test was applied for comparison of demographic and key clinical variables among different groups. Results: The median age of the 281 participants was 58 years and the majority were female (66.6%). One hundred one (36.9%) participants received 2 low risk scores, 99 (35.2%) received 1 low risk and 1 average risk score, 37 (13.2%) received 1 low risk and 1 high risk score, 23 (8.2%) received 2 average risk scores, 21 (7.5%) received 1 average risk and 1 high risk score, and no one received 2 high risk scores. Before receiving GRSs, younger patients and women reported significantly more worry about risk of developing cancer. After receiving GRSs, those who received at least one high GRS reported significantly more worry about developing cancer. There were no significant differences found between gender, age, or GRS with regards to participants’ reported optimism about their future health neither before nor after receiving GRS results. Conclusions: Genetic risk scores that quantify an individual’s risk of developing breast, prostate and colorectal cancers as compared with a race-defined population average risk have potential clinical utility as a tool for risk stratification and to guide cancer screening in a primary care setting.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Translational Medicine-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBreast cancer-
dc.subjectCancer screening-
dc.subjectColorectal cancer-
dc.subjectGenetic risk score-
dc.subjectProstate cancer-
dc.subjectSingle nucleotide polymorphism-
dc.subjectTranslational genomics-
dc.titleAssessing the clinical utility of genetic risk scores for targeted cancer screening-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12967-020-02699-w-
dc.identifier.pmid33482857-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7821544-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85099754816-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 41-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 41-
dc.identifier.eissn1479-5876-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000610061400001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats